Alarm burden and the nursing care environment: a 213-hospital cross-sectional study
Open Access
- 25 October 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Quality
- Vol. 12 (4) , e002342
Abstract
Background: High rates of medical device alarms in hospitals are a well-documented threat to patient safety. Little is known about organisational features that may be associated with nurses’ experience of alarm burden. Aims: To evaluate the association between nurse-reported alarm burden, appraisals of patient safety, quality of care and hospital characteristics. Methods: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data from 3986 hospital-based direct-care registered nurses in 213 acute care hospitals in New York and Illinois, USA. We evaluated associations of alarm burden with appraisals of patient safety and quality of care and hospital characteristics (work environment, staffing adequacy, size, teaching status) using χ2 tests. Results: The majority of respondents reported feeling overwhelmed by alarms (83%), delaying their response to alarms because they were unable to step away from another patient/task (76%), and experiencing situations where a patient needed urgent attention but no one responded to an alarm (55%). Nurses on medical-surgical units reported these experiences at higher rates than nurses working in intensive care units (p<0.001). Alarm burden items were significantly associated with poorer nurse-reported patient safety, quality of care, staffing and work environment. Findings were most pronounced for situations where a patient needed urgent attention but no one responded to the alarm, which was frequently/occasionally experienced by 72% of those who rated their hospital’s safety as poor versus 38% good, p<0.001; 80% who rated overall quality of care poor/fair versus 46% good/excellent, p<0.001 and 65% from poor work environments versus 42% from good work environments, p<0.001. Conclusion: Most nurses reported feeling overwhelmed by medical device alarms, and our findings suggest that alarm burden may be more pronounced in hospitals with unfavourable working conditions and suboptimal quality and safety. Because this was a cross-sectional study, further research is needed to explore causal relationships and the role of modifiable systems factors in reducing alarm burden.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Council of State Boards of Nursing (RN4CAST-NY/IL)
- NIH (T32 NR007104)
- University of Pennsylvania (University Research Foundation Research Grant)
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alarm fatigue and its influence on staff performanceIIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 2015
- Association between exposure to nonactionable physiologic monitor alarms and response time in a children's hospitalJournal of Hospital Medicine, 2015
- Alarm system management: evidence-based guidance encouraging direct measurement of informativeness to improve alarm responseBMJ Quality & Safety, 2015
- Insights into the Problem of Alarm Fatigue with Physiologic Monitor Devices: A Comprehensive Observational Study of Consecutive Intensive Care Unit PatientsPLOS ONE, 2014
- Attitudes and Practices Related to Clinical AlarmsAmerican Journal of Critical Care, 2014
- SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patientsErgonomics, 2013
- Alarm FatigueAACN Advanced Critical Care, 2013
- The Association of Registered Nurse Staffing Levels and Patient OutcomesMedical Care, 2007
- Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index†‡Research in Nursing & Health, 2002
- Crying wolfCritical Care Medicine, 1994