Comparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: quantitative study findings
Authors:
- Stacie HudgensSHStacie Hudgens
- the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium and Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) ConsortiumTCthe Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium and Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) Consortium
Open Access
- 26 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Vol. 6 (1) , 1-11
Abstract
Objective: To quantitatively compare equivalence and compliance of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collected via provisioned device (PD) versus bring your own device (BYOD). Methods: Participants with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) completed the EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT®) daily and COPD Assessment Test™ (CAT) and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) of COPD weekly on either PD or BYOD for 15 days, then switched device types for 15 days. EXACT was scored using the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS®: COPD) algorithm and equivalence assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) adjusting for cross-over sequence, period, and time. Two one-sided tests (TOSTs) used ICC adjusted means with 10%, 20%, and 40% of total score tested as equivalence margins. Compliance and comfort with technology were assessed. Equivalence across 3 device screen sizes was assessed following the second completion period. Results: Participants (N = 64) reported high comfort with technology, with 79.7% reporting being “quite a bit” or “very” comfortable. Weekly compliance was high (BYOD = 89.7–100%; PD = 76.9–100%). CAT and E-RS: COPD scores correlated well with PGIS (r > 0.50) and demonstrated equivalence between PD and BYOD completion (ICC = 0.863–0.908). TOST equivalence was achieved within 10% of the total score (p > 0.05). PRO measure scores were equivalent across 3 different screen sizes (ICC = 0.972–0.989). Conclusions: Measure completion was high and scores equivalent between PD and BYOD, supporting use of BYOD in addition to PD for collecting PRO data in COPD studies and in demographically diverse patient populations.Keywords
Funding Information
- Critical Path Institute
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adding a fatigue item to the EQ-5D-5L improves its psychometric performance in the general populationJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2022
- Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Migrated to Electronic Formats: A Review of Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Trials and Bring Your Own DeviceTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2019
- Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence TrialValue in Health, 2018
- Utilizing a Personal Smartphone Custom App to Assess the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Major Depressive DisorderJMIR Mental Health, 2015
- FRI0201 Are Rheumatic Disease Patient Reported Outcomes Collected Passively and Directly through Smart Phones Feasible? Early Results from A Nation-Wide Pilot StudyAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2014
- MEFV mutations affecting pyrin amino acid 577 cause autosomal dominant autoinflammatory diseaseAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2014
- Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measures for Clinical Trials of COPD: The EXACT and E-RSCOPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2013
- Measuring Physical Activity in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Population Using a Smartphone-Based QuestionnaireJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2013
- Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment TestEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2009
- Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 1979