Exploring the introduction of entrustment rating scales in an existing objective structured clinical examination
Open Access
- 22 August 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 19 (1) , 1-9
Abstract
The concept of EPAs is increasingly applied to assess trainees’ workplace performance by means of entrustment ratings. OSCEs assess performance in a simulated setting, and it is unclear whether entrustment ratings can be integrated into these exams. This study explores the introduction of an entrustment rating scale into an existing OSCE. A 6-point entrustment scale was added to the standard ratings in an OSCE administered prior to students’ final clerkship year in an undergraduate medical programme. Standard OSCE ratings assess clinical and communication skills. Assessors (n = 54) rated students’ performance (n = 227) on a diverse set of clinical tasks and evaluated the addition of entrustment scales to OSCEs. Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated for analyses. Student performance varied across the stations, as reflected in both the standard OSCE ratings and the added entrustment ratings. Students received generally high standard OSCE ratings, whereas entrustment ratings were more widely distributed. All students passed the OSCE, and only a small proportion of students did not reach the expected pass threshold of 60% on the standard ratings in the single stations. The proportion of students who did not reach the expected entrustment level in the respective stations was noticeably higher. Both the clinical and communication skill ratings were related to the entrustment rating in most OSCE stations. A majority of the assessors positively evaluated the addition of entrustment ratings into the OSCE. The findings provide an empirical basis to broaden our understanding of the potential use of entrustment ratings in existing OSCEs. They provide directions for future, more specific studies. The ratings might be used for formative feedback on students’ readiness for workplace practice.Keywords
Funding Information
- Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt (Hochschulpakt MSM 2.0)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Case for Use of Entrustable Professional Activities in Undergraduate Medical EducationAcademic Medicine, 2015
- The Use of Global Rating Scales for OSCEs in Veterinary MedicinePLOS ONE, 2015
- Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education?Medical Teacher, 2013
- An argument-based approach to the validation of UHTRUST: can we measure how recent graduates can be trusted with unfamiliar tasks?Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2013
- Conceptual framework for performance assessment: Competency, competence and performance in the context of assessments in healthcare – Deciphering the terminologyMedical Teacher, 2012
- Workplace-based assessment: raters’ performance theories and constructsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2012
- Making sense of work‐based assessment: ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right peopleMedical Education, 2011
- Assessing students’ communication skills: validation of a global ratingAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2007
- Viewpoint: Competency-Based Postgraduate Training: Can We Bridge the Gap between Theory and Clinical Practice?Academic Medicine, 2007
- Entrustability of professional activities and competency‐based trainingMedical Education, 2005