Categorization and Cooperation across Games
Open Access
Abstract
We study a model where agents face a continuum of two-player games and categorize them into a finite number of situations to make sense of their complex environment. Agents need not share the same categorization. Each agent can cooperate or defect, conditional on the perceived category. The games are fully ordered by the strength of the temptation to defect and break joint cooperation. In equilibrium agents share the same categorization, but achieve less cooperation than if they could perfectly discriminate games. All the equilibria are evolutionarily stable, but stochastic stability selects against cooperation. We model agents’ learning when they imitate successful players over similar games, but lack any information about the opponents’ categorizations. We show that imitation conditional on reaching an intermediate aspiration level leads to a shared categorization that achieves higher cooperation than under perfect discrimination.Keywords
Funding Information
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (732942)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conditional behavior and learning in similar stag hunt gamesExperimental Economics, 2018
- RULE RATIONALITYInternational Economic Review, 2016
- Striving for balance in economics: Towards a theory of the social determination of behaviorJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2016
- Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the LaboratoryManagement Science, 2016
- Learning across gamesGames and Economic Behavior, 2012
- Do Conventions Need to Be Common Knowledge?Topoi, 2008
- Learning dynamics in social dilemmasProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002
- Strategic Similarity and Emergent Conventions: Evidence from Similar Stag Hunt GamesGames and Economic Behavior, 2000
- Fictitious Play by CasesGames and Economic Behavior, 1995
- Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and InstitutionsKyklos, 1994