Predictive value of pretreatment risk group and baseline LDH levels in MDS patients receiving azacitidine treatment
Authors:
- 17 March 2010
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Hematology
- Vol. 89 (7) , 681-689
Abstract
This study analyzed the outcomes of myelodysplastic syndrome patients treated with azacitidine. Between August 2006 and June 2008, a total of 126 patients were treated with azacitidine at a dose of 75 mg/m2/day subcutaneously for 7 days, which was repeated every 28 days. The median age of the patients was 64 (range, 20–82) years. Forty-three patients (33.4%) were classified as intermediate-2 and high risk according to International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), while 61 patients (47.3%) were classified as high and very high risk according to WHO Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS). Sixty patients (47.6%) exhibited a response at the median of 3 (range, 1–5) cycles. A complete response was observed in 21 patients (16.7%), a partial response in six patients (4.8%), and total hematologic improvement in 61 patients (48.4%). For the IPSS risk group, the median survival for the patients with intermediate-1 was 20.0 months, for intermediate-2 was 14.9 months, and for high risk was 6.3 months (p = 0.008). For the WPSS risk group, the median survival duration was 21.3 months for the very low and low risk patients, 16.5 months for intermediate risk patients, and 14.9 months for the high and very high risk patients (p = 0.003). The patients with higher than normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at the time of diagnosis showed a poor survival (p = 0.003). The median survival duration for the patients with high LDH levels was 13.9 months, while that for the patients with normal LDH levels was 20.6 months. The multivariate analyses revealed that high LDH levels [hazard ratio (HR) 4.384, p < 0.001] and high and very high WPSS risk group (HR 3.855, p = 0.014) were significantly associated with a worse survival, whereas a response to azacitidine was identified as a good prognostic factor for survival (HR 0.224, p = 0.019). In conclusion, while the pretreatment risk group and initial LDH levels were both confirmed as important prognostic factors to predict the outcomes for patients treated with azacitidine, more effective therapies are still needed to prevent disease progression.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2009
- WHO classification and WPSS predict posttransplantation outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a study from the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO)Blood, 2008
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes: IntroductionSeminars in Hematology, 2008
- Time-Dependent Prognostic Scoring System for Predicting Survival and Leukemic Evolution in Myelodysplastic SyndromesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Definitions and standards in the diagnosis and treatment of the myelodysplastic syndromes: Consensus statements and report from a working conferenceLeukemia Research, 2007
- Survival advantage with decitabine versus intensive chemotherapy in patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromeCancer, 2007
- Update of the decitabine experience in higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome and analysis of prognostic factors associated with outcomeCancer, 2007
- Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasiaBlood, 2006
- Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromesCancer, 2006
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Azacitidine in Patients With the Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group BJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002