Evaluation of Sustained Disease Control With Nipocalimab Versus Placebo in the Phase 3 Vivacity‐ MG3 Study
Open Access
- 19 May 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Neurology
- Vol. 33 (5) , e70599
Abstract
Background: Patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) frequently have variable and fluctuating symptoms. Treatments providing long‐term, sustained disease control are essential for improving function and health‐related quality of life. Methods: In the phase 3 Vivacity‐MG3 study, nipocalimab improved clinical outcomes in adults with gMG when added to standard‐of‐care (SOC) therapy. These post hoc analyses further assessed the ability of nipocalimab to produce sustained responses over 24 weeks, using the following response categories for total score improvements in Myasthenia Gravis‐Activities of Daily Living (MG‐ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), respectively: Meaningful Clinical Improvement (MCI; ≥ 2‐ and ≥ 3‐point), Substantial Improvement (SI; ≥ 3‐ and ≥ 4‐point), Considerable Improvement (CIP; ≥ 4‐ and ≥ 5), Composite Response (CR; MG‐ADL improvement ≥ 2‐points plus QMG improvement ≥ 3‐points), and Minimal Symptom Expression (MSE; MG‐ADL 0 or 1). Results: Significantly higher percentages of nipocalimab‐treated than placebo‐treated participants achieved MG‐ADL MCI, SI, and CIP, sustained for ≥ 12 consecutive weeks; achievement of these outcomes occurred as early as week 1 among nipocalimab‐treated participants. Similar results were observed for QMG MCI, SI, and CIP. Significantly higher percentages of nipocalimab‐treated participants achieved CR, sustained for ≥ 8 consecutive weeks versus placebo; the likelihood of achieving sustained CR for ≥ 8 weeks was higher with nipocalimab (odds ratio = 6.3). Nipocalimab‐treated participants were 4‐fold more likely to achieve MSE, sustained for ≥ 8 consecutive weeks versus placebo ( p = 0.022). MSE and CR were achieved earlier among nipocalimab‐treated participants. Conclusions: Nipocalimab treatment improves gMG symptoms earlier than placebo and provides meaningful and long‐term sustained disease control over 24 weeks among participants with gMG.Keywords
Funding Information
- Johnson and Johnson
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- A literature review exploring whether meaningful change threshold estimates for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures vary depending on baseline severityQuality of Life Research, 2025
- AANEM 2024 Annual Meeting Abstracts GuideMuscle & Nerve, 2024
- The impact of myasthenia gravis severity on work and daily activitiesMuscle & Nerve, 2024
- Utilization of MG‐ADL in myasthenia gravis clinical research and careMuscle & Nerve, 2022
- The Lived Experience of Myasthenia Gravis: A Patient-Led AnalysisNeurology and Therapy, 2021
- ‘Minimal symptom expression’ in patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalized myasthenia gravis treated with eculizumabJournal of Neurology, 2020
- M281, an Anti‐FcRn Antibody: Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety Across the Full Range of IgG Reduction in a First‐in‐Human StudyClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2018
- Minimal clinically important difference in myasthenia gravis: Outcomes from a randomized trialMuscle & Nerve, 2013
- MG‐ADL: Still a relevant outcome measureMuscle & Nerve, 2011
- Construct and concurrent validation of the MG‐QOL15 in the practice settingMuscle & Nerve, 2009