Re-evaluating the timing of sequential cranial ultrasound screening in very preterm infants for predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes
- 4 December 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Pediatric Radiology
- Vol. 55 (1) , 173-182
Abstract
Objective Accurate and early prediction of neurodevelopmental impairment is a crucial endeavor in caring for very preterm infants (0–306 weeks) born between January 2004 and December 2018 with a neurodevelopmental assessment at 36 months corrected age were included. Three prediction models of neurodevelopmental impairment were compared: 1. A reference model including the gestational age, infant sex, and 2-week and 6-week ultrasound 2. A model including the gestational age, infant sex, and 6-week ultrasound 3. A model including the gestational age, infant sex, and 2-week ultrasound Results Of 786 eligible preterm infants born during the study period, 656/786 survivors were included in the analysis (mean gestational age 275 weeks, mean birth weight 1,133 g, and 55% male infants). At 36 months of corrected age, 30% developed neurodevelopmental impairment. All three models provided comparable discrimination areas under the curve (AUC) of neurodevelopmental impairment at 36 months of corrected age. Both the 6-week and the reference model had similar AUC of 0.68 (95% CI 0.63–0.72) and were not noticeably different from the 2-week model (AUC 0.66 (95% CI 0.61–0.70)). The 6-week model provided the best prediction with the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) of 766 for the 6-week-only model, AIC 769 for combined weeks 2 and 6 (reference model), and AIC 784 for the 2-week-only model. Conclusion In this cohort of very preterm infants, a model including 6-week ultrasound only was comparable to a reference model combining 2-week and 6-week ultrasound and showed nearly identical predictive performance of neurodevelopmental impairment at 36 months corrected age across a broad set of metrics; thus, it is redundant to do both the 2-week and 6-week ultrasound. Clinical relevance statement Late ultrasound at 6 weeks of age provided comparable diagnostic and prognostic information to a reference model combining 2-week and 6-week ultrasound and, if anything, was slightly superior to the 2-week ultrasound model, across a broad set of metrics. The 2-week ultrasound can be eliminated with no impact on the prediction of neurodevelopmental impairment at 36 months, promoting prudent resource allocation and stewardship in healthcare. Graphical AbstractKeywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Phillips/RSNA seed grant 2021 (RSD2102, RSD2102)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a Cranial Ultrasound Screening Protocol for Very Preterm InfantsJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2022
- Combined predictors of neurodevelopment in very low birth weight preterm infantsEarly Human Development, 2019
- Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: Part I – Continuous outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2018
- Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAICStatistics and Computing, 2016
- Comparison of Bayesian predictive methods for model selectionStatistics and Computing, 2016
- Predictability of cerebral palsy in a high-risk NICU populationEarly Human Development, 2010
- Comparing brain white matter on sequential cranial ultrasound and MRI in very preterm infantsNeuroradiology, 2008
- Clinical Data Predict Neurodevelopmental Outcome Better than Head Ultrasound in Extremely Low Birth Weight InfantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2007
- Predictive values of cranial ultrasound and assessment of general movements for neurological development of preterm infants in the Maribor region of SloveniaWiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2007
- An introduction to ROC analysisPattern Recognition Letters, 2006