All-Possible-Couplings Approach to Measuring Probabilistic Context
Open Access
- 6 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (5) , e61712
Abstract
From behavioral sciences to biology to quantum mechanics, one encounters situations where (i) a system outputs several random variables in response to several inputs, (ii) for each of these responses only some of the inputs may “directly” influence them, but (iii) other inputs provide a “context” for this response by influencing its probabilistic relations to other responses. These contextual influences are very different, say, in classical kinetic theory and in the entanglement paradigm of quantum mechanics, which are traditionally interpreted as representing different forms of physical determinism. One can mathematically construct systems with other types of contextuality, whether or not empirically realizable: those that form special cases of the classical type, those that fall between the classical and quantum ones, and those that violate the quantum type. We show how one can quantify and classify all logically possible contextual influences by studying various sets of probabilistic couplings, i.e., sets of joint distributions imposed on random outputs recorded at different (mutually incompatible) values of inputs.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Additive factors and stages of mental processes in task networksJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 2010
- The Joint Distribution Criterion and the Distance Tests for Selective Probabilistic CausalityFrontiers in Psychology, 2010
- Testing for selectivity in the dependence of random variables on external factorsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 2008
- BellTest and CHSH experiments with more than two settingsJournal of Physics A: General Physics, 2003
- Contextualism and Nonlocality in the Algebra of EPR ObservablesPhilosophy of Science, 1997
- Uncovering mental processes with factorial experimentsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1984
- Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-BohmGedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's InequalitiesPhysical Review Letters, 1982
- Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell InequalitiesPhysical Review Letters, 1982
- When are probabilistic explanations possible?Synthese, 1981
- Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and PodolskyPhysical Review B, 1957