Development and validation of antibiotic stewardship metrics for outpatient respiratory tract diagnoses and association of provider characteristics with inappropriate prescribing
Authors:
- Keith W. HamiltonKHKeith W. Hamilton
- For The Cdc Prevention Epicenters ProgramFPFor The Cdc Prevention Epicenters Program
- 2 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 43 (1) , 56-63
Abstract
Objective: To determine metrics and provider characteristics associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract diagnoses (RTDs).Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting: Primary care practices in a university health system.Participants: Patients seen by an attending physician or advanced practice provider (APP) at their primary care office visit with International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM)–coded RTDs.Methods: Medical records were reviewed for 1,200 randomly selected office visits in which an antibiotic was prescribed to determine appropriateness. Based on this gold standard, metrics and provider characteristics associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were determined.Results: Overall, 69% of antibiotics were inappropriate. Metrics utilizing prespecified RTDs most strongly associated with inappropriate prescribing were (1) proportion prescribing for RTDs for which antibiotics are almost never required (eg, bronchitis) and (2) proportion prescribing for any RTD. Provider characteristics associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were APP versus physician (72% vs 58%; P = .02), family medicine versus internal medicine (76% vs 63%; P = .01), board certification 1997 or later versus board certification before 1997 (75% vs 63%; P = .02), nonteaching versus teaching practice (73% vs 51%; P < .01), and nonurban vs urban practice (77% vs 57%; P < .01).Conclusions: Metrics utilizing proportion prescribing for RTDs for which antibiotics are almost never required and proportion prescribing for any RTD were most strongly associated with inappropriate prescribing. APPs and clinicians with family medicine training, with board certification 1997 or later, and who worked in nonteaching or nonurban practices had higher proportions of inappropriate prescribing. These findings could inform design of interventions to improve prescribing and could represent an efficient way to track inappropriate prescribing.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- US Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Variation According to Geography, Patient Population, and Provider Specialty in 2011Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2015
- Trends and Seasonal Variation in Outpatient Antibiotic Prescription Rates in the United States, 2006 to 2010Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2014
- The Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis MediaPediatrics, 2013
- A national evaluation of antibiotic expenditures by healthcare setting in the United States, 2009Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2012
- Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis: 2012 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of AmericaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2012
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient antibiotic use in EuropeJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2006
- A pseudo-outbreak of nosocomial infections associated with the introduction of an antibiotic management programmeJournal of Hospital Infection, 2003
- Excessive Antibiotic Use for Acute Respiratory Infections in the United StatesClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001