Adding links, adding persons, and adding structures: Using Sen's frameworks
Author:
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- dialogue
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Feminist Economics
- Vol. 13 (1) , 67-85
Abstract
This essay is a comment on “Sen on Freedom and Gender Justice,” by Mozaffar Qizilbash, which appeared in Feminist Economics Volume 11, Number 3, November 2005. Building on the 2003 double special issue of Feminist Economics entitled “Amartya Sen's Work and Ideas,” this paper responds to the review essay by Mozaffar Qizilbash. It identifies and illustrates various possible evaluations of a theoretical system, including that it has acknowledged strengths, unrecognized strengths, remediable gaps or failings, or structural faults. The paper then looks at Sen's system as a theoretical basis for “human development”– in particular in relation to personhood, emotions, and psychological interdependence – and argues that it points in directions required for economic and social analysis, including towards theories of care, but is not itself a sufficient treatment. The paper suggests deepening Sen's system by connecting to other important languages of analysis concerning the structuring of attitudes, emotions, felt well-being, public reasoning, and politics.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deepening Development Ethics: From Economism to Human Development to Human SecurityThe European Journal of Development Research, 2005
- WHY EXACTLY IS COMMITMENT IMPORTANT FOR RATIONALITY?Economics and Philosophy, 2005
- SEN'S CAPABILITY APPROACH AND GENDER INEQUALITY: SELECTING RELEVANT CAPABILITIESFeminist Economics, 2003
- GENDER AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIAL CHOICE: THE ROLE OF SITUATED AGENCYFeminist Economics, 2003
- DEVELOPMENT AS EMPOWERMENTFeminist Economics, 2003
- SEN, ETHICS, AND DEMOCRACYFeminist Economics, 2003
- CAPABILITIES AS FUNDAMENTAL ENTITLEMENTS: SEN AND SOCIAL JUSTICEFeminist Economics, 2003
- On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-BeingAnnual Review of Psychology, 2001
- On Sen's Liberal Paradox and its Reception within Political Theory and Welfare EconomicsPolitics, 2000
- Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's EmpowermentDevelopment and Change, 1999