Return-Stroke Multiplicity of Negative Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Flashes
Authors:
- Vladimir A. RakovVRVladimir A. Rakov
- Gary R. HuffinesGHGary R. Huffines
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
- Vol. 42 (10) , 1455-1462
Abstract
The percentage of negative lightning flashes composed of a single stroke is examined. This percentage is estimated from data reported by the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) for Florida and New Mexico and is compared with that determined from electric field and optical observations in these two states. The latter observations allowed a very accurate stroke count and, therefore, were used as the ground truth in the comparison. The percentage of negative single-stroke flashes reported by the NLDN is a factor of 2–3 higher than from the accurate-stroke-count studies in Florida (44% vs 17%) and is a factor of 3–4 higher in New Mexico (51% vs 14%). The observed discrepancies suggest that many small subsequent strokes are missed by the NLDN because these strokes fail to exceed the system's trigger threshold level so that only one stroke per flash is recorded in many multiple-stroke flashes. The percentage of negative single-stroke flashes reported by the Austrian lightning detection net... Abstract The percentage of negative lightning flashes composed of a single stroke is examined. This percentage is estimated from data reported by the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) for Florida and New Mexico and is compared with that determined from electric field and optical observations in these two states. The latter observations allowed a very accurate stroke count and, therefore, were used as the ground truth in the comparison. The percentage of negative single-stroke flashes reported by the NLDN is a factor of 2–3 higher than from the accurate-stroke-count studies in Florida (44% vs 17%) and is a factor of 3–4 higher in New Mexico (51% vs 14%). The observed discrepancies suggest that many small subsequent strokes are missed by the NLDN because these strokes fail to exceed the system's trigger threshold level so that only one stroke per flash is recorded in many multiple-stroke flashes. The percentage of negative single-stroke flashes reported by the Austrian lightning detection net...Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance evaluation of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network in eastern New York: 2. Location accuracyJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998
- Performance evaluation of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network in eastern New York: 1. Detection efficiencyJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998
- A Combined TOA/MDF Technology Upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection NetworkJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998
- Lightning characteristics based on data from the Austrian lightning locating systemIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1998
- Characteristics of lightning flashes observed in Sri Lanka in the tropicsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994
- Some features of lightning flashes observed in SwedenJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994
- Electric fields preceding cloud‐to‐ground lightning flashesJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1982
- An analysis of the charge structure of lightning discharges to groundJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1979
- Multiple-stroke flashes of lightningJournal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 1979
- Continuing currents in cloud-to-ground lightning dischargesJournal of Geophysical Research, 1962