Crowdfunding success: the role of co-creation, feedback, and corporate social responsibility
- 27 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research
- Vol. 26 (3) , 449-466
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors that determine two forms of crowdfunding campaign success: success in securing the necessary financial resources and personal success in terms of the entrepreneur’s satisfaction. Specifically, it studies factors linked to the relationship between entrepreneurs and funders (co-creation and feedback) and factors linked to the campaign’s content (dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR)). Design/methodology/approach: An empirical study of 52 crowdfunding entrepreneurs was conducted. Data were gathered using a structured questionnaire. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis was performed. Findings: For financial and personal success, all factors, except the social dimension of CSR, are necessary conditions. Two configurations are sufficient for entrepreneurs to achieve financial success. The first configuration that is sufficient for personal success is the same as the first configuration for financial success. The second configuration for personal success is similar to the second configuration for financial success, except that it also includes financial success itself. Research limitations/implications: Entrepreneurs should invest in CSR and seek to improve the quality of their relationships with their funders. Crowdfunding platforms should design and manage co-creation and feedback tools that are capable of providing deep knowledge of users’ opinions and concerns whilst generating value. The limitations of this study are that only the reward-based crowdfunding model was considered, and the data covered just two platforms. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature by presenting empirical analysis of the factors that influence financial success and personal success in reward-based crowdfunding. It examines aspects that strictly refer to the content of the project and aspects that refer to the entrepreneur–funder relationship. Specifically, the roles of the four dimensions of CSR were considered. Moreover, the fsQCA method provides a fresh approach to research in this area.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theoryJournal of Business Research, 2013
- The role of entrepreneurs in transferring knowledge through human resource management and joint ventureInternational Journal of Manpower, 2011
- Why Customers Value Self‐Designed Products: The Importance of Process Effort and Enjoyment*Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010
- Consumer Cocreation in New Product DevelopmentJournal of Service Research, 2010
- How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational CommitmentJournal of Business Ethics, 2008
- Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development StudyJournal of Business Ethics, 2008
- Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and CoveragePolitical Analysis, 2006
- The Feedback Environment Scale: Construct Definition, Measurement, and ValidationEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2004
- Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 1996
- A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 1995