Reduced Emergence of the M184V/I Resistance Mutation When Antiretroviral-Naïve Subjects Use Emtricitabine Versus Lamivudine in Regimens Composed of Two NRTIs Plus the NNRTI Efavirenz
Authors:
- Damian J. McCollDMDamian J. McColl
- Nicolas MargotNMNicolas Margot
- Shan-Shan ChenSCShan-Shan Chen
- Jeanette HarrisJHJeanette Harris
- Katyna Borroto-EsodaKBKatyna Borroto-Esoda
- Michael D. MillerMMMichael D. Miller
- 1 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in HIV Research & Clinical Practice
- Vol. 12 (2) , 61-70
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the development of the M184V/I substitution among antiretroviral treatment-naïve patients taking the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) emtricitabine (FTC) or lamivudine (3TC) from three phase 3 clinical trials of dual NRTIs (including either FTC or 3TC) plus the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz (EFV). Methods: Study subjects from three phase 3 clinical trials (FTC 301A, GS-99-903, and GS-01-934) were classified as virologic failures (VF) if they had confirmed ≥400 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA at week 48 or early study drug discontinuation. Subjects with VF were genotyped by population sequencing. The prevalence of the M184V/I substitution in the FTC or 3TC groups was analyzed using Fisher exact test and in multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: Among the 3 trials, 522 subjects were treated with FTC dosed once daily and 841 subjects were treated with 3TC dosed twice daily. Among VF subjects at week 48, 5/26 (19.2%) FTC-treated subjects and 27/77 (35.5%) 3TC-treated subjects developed the M184V/I mutation (P = .145). Using the denominator of all subjects treated, 5/522 (1.0%) FTC-treated subjects versus 27/841 (3.2%) 3TC-treated subjects developed the M184V/I substitution (P = .009). Multivariate analyses adjusting for baseline viral load, baseline CD4 cell counts, and baseline NRTI resistance showed that treatment with FTC had a significantly lower rate of M184V/I development than treatment with 3TC (odds ratio 0.32; P = .02). Conclusions: The results of this pooled analysis of 3 clinical trials indicate a lower frequency of development of the M184V/I mutation in subjects treated with FTC versus 3TC when combined in regimens containing dual NRTIs and EFV.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emerging mutations at virological failure of HAART combinations containing tenofovir and lamivudine or emtricitabineAIDS, 2010
- Differential impact of adherence on long-term treatment response among naive HIV-infected individualsAIDS, 2008
- Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Adherence in HIV-1—Infected, Antiretroviral-Naïve Patients Treated with Ritonavir-Boosted Atazanavir Plus Fixed-Dose Tenofovir DF/Emtricitabine Given Once DailyHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2008
- Preexisting Resistance to Nonnucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitors Predicts Virologic Failure of an Efavirenz‐Based Regimen in Treatment‐Naive HIV‐1–Infected SubjectsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Baseline Genotype as a Predictor of Virological Failure to Emtricitabine or Stavudine in Combination with Didanosine and EfavirenzAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2007
- In Vitro Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Resistance Selections with Combinations of Tenofovir and Emtricitabine or Abacavir and LamivudineAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2006
- Emergence of Drug Resistance Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Death among Patients First Starting HAARTPLOS Medicine, 2006
- Prospective Randomized Trial of Emtricitabine versus Lamivudine Short‐Term Monotherapy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected PatientsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003
- The role of steric hindrance in 3TC resistance of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 reverse transcriptase 1 1Edited by A. R. FershtJournal of Molecular Biology, 2000
- Mechanistic Studies Comparing the Incorporation of (+) and (−) Isomers of 3TCTP by HIV-1 Reverse TranscriptaseBiochemistry, 1998