Supplier perceptions of distributive justice in sustainable apparel sourcing
- 5 June 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Vol. 47 (5) , 368-386
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is two-fold: first, it attempts to determine whether suppliers perceive distributive justice (equity) when their key customers implement sustainable sourcing initiatives based on assessment governance, composed of codes of conduct and auditing; second, it generates insights into specific costs, rewards, and investments and how these together result in perceived equity.Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative research design was adopted for this study. A total of 30 executives from textile manufacturing suppliers in China, India, and Bangladesh were interviewed to determine their perceptions of distributive justice in relation to their key customers’ sustainable sourcing initiatives.Findings: Most of the interviewees perceived that their customers’ assessment of governance initiatives was unfair. Four types of suppliers are identified based on their varying perceptions of the equity equation.Research limitations/implications: The findings introduce distributive justice as an important mediating variable between assessment-based governance and compliance. They also provide insights into the various types of perceived costs, rewards, and investments related to sustainable sourcing, and how they form varieties of the equity equation. The findings rely on a limited number of respondents and should, therefore, be researched further.Practical implications: Assessment based on codes of conduct and auditing is the most prevalent sustainable sourcing governance approach, but suppliers may perceive this as an injustice leading to non-compliance. Buying companies are therefore advised to consider supplier perceptions of costs, rewards, and investments and adapt their sustainable sourcing initiatives accordingly.Social implications: Increased consideration of distributive justice in sustainable sourcing should increase the likelihood of supplier compliance, improving conditions for employees in global textile plants.Originality/value: Extant research has studied the connection between assessment-based sustainability governance and compliance or overall performance. This paper contributes by suggesting that distributive justice might be a mediating variable helping to explain this connection.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Roles of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Logistics Outsourcing RelationshipsJournal of Business Logistics, 2012
- Sustainable Supply Chains: Governance Mechanisms to Greening SuppliersJournal of Business Ethics, 2012
- EFFECTS OF SUPPLIERS' REPUTATION ON THE FUTURE OF BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: THE MEDIATING ROLES OF OUTCOME FAIRNESS AND TRUSTJournal of Supply Chain Management, 2011
- Corporate social responsibility in global supply chainsSupply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2009
- Implementing Supplier Codes of Conduct in Global Supply Chains: Process Explanations from Theoretic and Empirical PerspectivesJournal of Business Ethics, 2008
- Purchasing's Role in Environmental Management: Cross‐Functional Development of Grounded TheoryJournal of Supply Chain Management, 2001
- The Reliability and Validity of Key Informant Data from Dyadic Relationships in Marketing ChannelsJournal of Marketing Research, 1982
- Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange NetworksAmerican Sociological Review, 1978
- Justice in Social ExchangeSociological Inquiry, 1964
- Social Behavior as ExchangeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1958