The contribution of prognostic factors to socio‐demographic inequalities in breast cancer survival in Victoria, Australia
Open Access
- 17 July 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 12 (14) , 15371-15383
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer survival in Australia varies according to socio‐economic status (SES) and between rural and urban places of residence. Part of this disparity may be due to differences in prognostic factors at the time of diagnosis.Methods: Women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2008 until 2012 (n = 14,165) were identified from the Victorian Cancer Registry and followed up for 5 years, with death from breast cancer or other causes recorded. A prognostic score, based on stage at diagnosis, cancer grade, whether the cancer was detected via screening, reported comorbidities and age at diagnosis, was constructed for use in a mediation analysis.Results: Five‐year breast cancer mortality for women with breast cancer who were in the lowest quintile of SES (10.3%) was almost double that of those in the highest quintile (5.7%). There was a small survival advantage (1.7% on average, within each socio‐economic quintile) of living in inner‐regional areas compared with major cities. About half of the socio‐economic disparity was mediated by prognostic factors, particularly stage at diagnosis and the presence of comorbidities. The inner‐regional survival advantage was not due to differences in prognostic factors.Conclusions: Part of the socio‐economic disparity in breast cancer survival could be addressed by earlier detection in, and improved general health for, more disadvantaged women. Further research is required to identify additional causes of socio‐economic disparities as well as the observed inner‐regional survival advantage.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1150012)
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tools to Support Interpreting Multiple Regression in the Face of MulticollinearityFrontiers in Psychology, 2012
- Multilevel determinants of breast cancer survival: association with geographic remoteness and area-level socioeconomic disadvantageBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2011
- Updating and Validating the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Score for Risk Adjustment in Hospital Discharge Abstracts Using Data From 6 CountriesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Socioeconomic, Rural-Urban, and Racial Inequalities in US Cancer Mortality: Part I—All Cancers and Lung Cancer and Part II—Colorectal, Prostate, Breast, and Cervical CancersJournal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2011
- Socioeconomic status and survival after an invasive breast cancer diagnosisCancer, 2010
- The impact of socioeconomic status on stage of cancer at diagnosis and survivalCancer, 2010
- Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer survival: relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment and raceBMC Cancer, 2009
- Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortalityInternational Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Model-based Estimation of Relative Risks and Other Epidemiologic Measures in Studies of Common Outcomes and in Case-Control StudiesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987