Populism, Research Integrity, and Trust. How Science-Related Populist Beliefs Shape the Relationship Between Ethical Conduct and Trust in Scientists
- 9 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Public Opinion Research
- Vol. 36 (3)
Abstract
Science-related populism is often used to undermine public trust in science. Good scientific practice contributes to public trust in science, whereas misconduct promotes public skepticism. Since research ethics are a vital part of research integrity, we argue that ethical misconduct potentially undermines trust in scientists, particularly among people with populist beliefs. Drawing on a quota sample of German citizens (N = 1,321), the experimental study examines the influence of ethical conduct on trust in scientists, moderated by science-related populist beliefs. More specifically, we tested the influence of experimental deception (with and without debriefing) using a vignette design. The results of our study showed that ethical misconduct is negatively associated with trust in scientists. In addition, the relationship between ethical misconduct and trust in scientists was influenced by both science-related populist beliefs and science literacy. Although people with high science-related populist beliefs generally placed less trust in scientists, the negative effect was even more pronounced for people with low science-related populist beliefs. Our findings further revealed that ethical misconduct reduces trust in science among people with both low and high science literacy. This demonstrates the importance of researchers transparently discussing and reflecting on ethical research conduct to promote trust in scientists.Keywords
Funding Information
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (16PH20009A, 16PH20009B)
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Science-Related Populism on Vaccination Attitudes and DecisionsJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 2022
- Data quality, experimental artifacts, and the reactivity of the psychological subject matterEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2022
- Populism and Science in Europe2022
- Translating Lessons from Status Characteristics and Expectation States Theory to Survey Methods2020
- Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity ConsortiumScience and Engineering Ethics, 2019
- Trust in Science and the Science of Trust2016
- “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in FacebookEthics and Information Technology, 2010
- Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reformJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 2000
- Scientific literacy: A conceptual overviewScience Education, 2000
- Science for the post-normal ageFutures, 1993