In vitro infectability of prosthetic mesh by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Authors:
- 2 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Hernia
- Vol. 10 (2) , 120-124
Abstract
Although mesh use is important for effective herniorrhaphy in adults, prosthetic infections can cause serious morbidity. Bacterial adherence to the mesh is a known precursor to prosthetic infection. We compared the ability of common mesh prosthetics to resist bacterial adherence. The meshes studied included polypropylene (Marlex®), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with and without silver chlorhexidine coating (DualMesh Plus® and Dualmesh®) composite meshes (Composix E/X®, Proceed™, and Parietex Composite®) and lightweight polypropylene meshes (TiMesh®, Ultrapro®, and Vypro®). Fifteen samples of each mesh type were individually inoculated with a suspension of 108 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in tryptic soy broth. After incubation at 37°C for 1 h, the mesh pieces were then removed and serially washed. The colony-forming units (CFU) of MRSA present in the initial inoculum, at the end of the 1-h warm-water bath (broth count), and the pooled washes (wash count), were determined using serial dilutions and spot plating. The bacteria not accounted for in the broth or wash counts were considered adhered to the mesh. Samples of each mesh type were also analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data are presented as the mean percentage adherence with ANOVA and Tukey’s test used to determine significance (P® mesh had no detectable MRSA in the broth or the pooled wash samples. Dualmesh® had less adherence compared with Marlex®, Proceed™, and Vypro® (P® had a statistically higher adherence (96%, P®, Ultrapro®, Composix E/X®, and Parietex Composite®. SEM confirmed bacterial adherence to all the mesh types except DualMesh Plus®. The ability of a biomaterial to resist infection has an important clinical significance. DualMesh Plus®, due to its antimicrobial coating, is the only mesh type of the nine tested that demonstrated a bactericidal property. Standard PTFE (Dualmesh®) also had less bacterial adherence. Vypro® demonstrated an increase in bacterial adherence; this was possibly due to the multifilament polyglactin 910 weaved within the prolene component of the mesh.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Suture Versus Mesh Repair of Incisional HerniaAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernioplasty: lessons learned from 200 patientsHernia, 2003
- Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral HerniasAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy for Palmaris HyperhidrosisSouthern Medical Journal, 2003
- Do multifilament alloplastic meshes increase the infection rate? Analysis of the polymeric surface, the bacteria adherence, and the in vivo consequences in a rat modelJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2002
- Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adultsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Antibiotic prophylaxis in incisional hernia repair using a prosthesisHernia, 2001
- The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacementsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2000
- Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Herniorrhaphy and Breast SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Comparison of Prosthetic Materials for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in the Presence of Contamination and InfectionAnnals of Surgery, 1985