How to Present a Decision Object in Health Preference Research: Attributes and Levels, the Decision Model, and the Descriptive Framework
Open Access
- 10 February 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
- Vol. 18 (4) , 291-302
Abstract
In health preference research (HPR) studies, data are generated by participants’/subjects’ decisions. When developing an HPR study, it is therefore important to have a clear understanding of the components of a decision and how those components stimulate participant behavior. To obtain valid and reliable results, study designers must sufficiently describe the decision model and its components. HPR studies require a detailed examination of the decision criteria, detailed documentation of the descriptive framework, and specification of hypotheses. The objects that stimulate subjects’ decisions in HPR studies are defined by attributes and attribute levels. Any limitations in the identification and presentation of attributes and levels can negatively affect preference elicitation, the quality of the HPR data, and study results. This practical guide shows how to link the HPR question to an underlying decision model. It covers how to (1) construct a descriptive framework that presents relevant characteristics of a decision object and (2) specify the research hypotheses. The paper outlines steps and available methods to achieve all this, including the methods’ advantages and limitations.Keywords
Funding Information
- Hochschule Neubrandenburg
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Representing randomness in the communication of individualized cancer risk estimates: Effects on cancer risk perceptions, worry, and subjective uncertainty about riskPatient Education and Counseling, 2012
- Attribute Framing in Choice Experiments: How Do Attribute Level Descriptions Affect Value Estimates?Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011
- Construal-level theory of psychological distance.Psychological Review, 2010
- The use of the repertory grid technique to examine staff beliefs about clients with dual diagnosisClinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 2009
- An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in healthHealth Economics, 2002
- Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation MethodAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing EffectsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998
- Eliciting Preferences for Alternative Cancer Drug TreatmentsMedical Decision Making, 1985
- A New Approach to Consumer TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 1966
- Snowball SamplingThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1961