Appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks in patients with LVADs: Prevalence, associated factors, and etiologies
Authors:
- 23 July 2024
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Heart Rhythm
- Vol. 22 (2) , 394-402
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- School of Medicine, Duke University
- National Institute on Aging
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (R01AG074185)
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a reviewJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2021
- Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator troubleshooting in patients with a left ventricular assist device: A case series and systematic reviewHeart Rhythm, 2020
- ICD shocks in LVAD patients are not associated with increased subsequent mortality riskJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2019
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist SystemsJACC, 2018
- Effect of Continued Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Ventricular Arrhythmias After Left Ventricular Assist Device ImplantationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2016
- Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy and Mortality through ICD ProgrammingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator ShocksJACC, 2011
- Improved survival among ventricular assist device recipients with a concomitant implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorHeart Rhythm, 2010
- Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks in MADIT IIJACC, 2008
- Malignant ventricular arrhythmias are well tolerated in patients receiving long-term left ventricular assist devicesJACC, 1994