Comparison of the glucagon‐like‐peptide‐1 receptor agonists dulaglutide and liraglutide for the management of diabetes in solid organ transplant: A retrospective study
Open Access
- 13 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
- Vol. 22 (5) , 879-884
Abstract
Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) are gaining popularity in the management of diabetes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. There are no studies available comparing the two GLP‐1RAs dulaglutide and liraglutide in SOT. We performed a retrospective chart review to assess the safety and effectiveness of these agents in adult SOT with diabetes at 6, 12 and 24 months. There were 63 and 25 recipients on dulaglutide and liraglutide, respectively. There was a sustained reduction in primary endpoints of weight, BMI and insulin requirement with dulaglutide when compared to liraglutide. Decrease in weight was 2%, 4% and 5.2% with dulaglutide and 0.09%, 0.87% and 0.89% with liraglutide at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. BMI reduction followed the same trend in the two groups. The percentage reduction for insulin was 26% with dulaglutide and 3.6% with liraglutide. There was a 10% reduction in creatinine and a 15% increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the end of 24 months with dulaglutide. However, there was an increase in creatinine by 7% and an 8% decrease in eGFR at the end of 24 months with liraglutide.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Rationale for use of Incretins in the Management of new Onset Diabetes After Transplantation (NODAT)Endocrine Practice, 2015
- Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trialThe Lancet, 2014
- Once-weekly albiglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral drugs (HARMONY 7): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority phase 3 studyThe Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2014
- Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide Once Daily Versus Exenatide Twice Daily in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on MetforminDiabetes Care, 2013
- Pharmacodynamic characteristics of lixisenatide once daily versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on metforminDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2013
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label studyThe Lancet, 2013
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once‐weekly vs exenatide twice‐daily in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusJournal of Diabetes Investigation, 2012
- DURATION-5: Exenatide Once Weekly Resulted in Greater Improvements in Glycemic Control Compared with Exenatide Twice Daily in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2011
- Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6)The Lancet, 2009
- Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority studyThe Lancet, 2008