Assessment of Chinese medicine for coronavirus-related pneumonia
Authors:
Open Access
- 12 June 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 99 (24) , e20613
Abstract
Background: The 2019 novel coronavirus disease has caused a global pandemic with substantial morbidity and mortality. Chinese medicine has been extensively employed in the coronavirus-related pandemic in China. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine in treatment of coronavirus-related pneumonia with the updated results of relevant clinical trials. Methods: Six electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, and SinoMed will be searched to identify randomized controlled trials up to May 2020. Patients diagnosed with coronavirus-related pneumonia including severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and 2019 novel coronavirus disease and administrated with Chinese medicine will be included. The primary outcome is the all cause mortality at the longest follow up available. The second outcomes include the length of stay in hospital and intensive care units, the duration of mechanical ventilation, and adverse events. The pooled effects will be analyzed and reported as risk ratios for dichotomous data using the Mantel–Haenszel method or mean differences for continuous data using the inverse-variance method. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses will be performed to test the robustness of the results and to explore the potential sources of heterogeneities. The Egger test and/or funnel plots will be used for the examination of publication bias. The grades of recommendation assessment, development, and evaluation methodology will be used to summarize the quality of evidence. The trial sequential analysis will be conducted to test whether the meta-analysis has a sufficient sample size after adjustment of the increased type I and II error risks. Results: The evidence to date of Chinese medicine in treatment of coronavirus-related pneumonia will be systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed. Conclusion: The relevant studies will be summarized and further evidence will be provided. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020178879Keywords
Funding Information
- the Beijing Ronghe Medical Development Foundation (No. 53110000MJ01794845)
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coronaviruses — drug discovery and therapeutic optionsNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2016
- Chinese herbs combined with Western medicine for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Effect of integrated traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine on the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome: A meta-analysisPharmacy Practice, 2007
- The Efficacy of Chinese Medicine for SARS: A Review of Chinese Publications After the CrisisThe American Journal of Chinese Medicine, 2007
- Chinese Herbal Medicine for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2004
- Management and prevention of SARS in ChinaPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2004