Male neonatal circumcision An evidence-based review
Authors:
- Ma Herb RidingsMRMa Herb Ridings
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAAPA
- Vol. 20 (2) , 32-36
Abstract
Controversy and confusing study results confound parents and clinicians alike. Despite some proven medical benefits of circumcision, cultural and religious beliefs still usually determine whether this procedure will be performed.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Circumcision Status and Risk of Sexually Transmitted Infection in Young Adult Males: An Analysis of a Longitudinal Birth CohortPediatrics, 2006
- Risk factors for genital HPV DNA in men resemble those found in women: a study of male attendees at a Danish STD clinicSexually Transmitted Infections, 2002
- Circumcision Policy StatementPediatrics, 1999
- Effect of circumcision on incidence of urinary tract infection in preschool boysThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1996
- Urinary Tract Infections and the Uncircumcised State: An UpdateClinical Pediatrics, 1993
- The Question of Routine Neonatal CircumcisionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Dorsal Penile Nerve Block for CircumcisionClinical Pediatrics, 1989
- Pain and Its Effects in the Human Neonate and FetusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Regional Anesthesia During Newborn CircumcisionClinical Pediatrics, 1983
- Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1968