Investigating and Dealing with Publication Bias and Other Reporting Biases
Authors:
- Matthew J. PageMPMatthew J. Page
- Jonathan A.C. SterneJSJonathan A.C. Sterne
- Julian P.T. HigginsJHJulian P.T. Higgins
- Matthias EggerMEMatthias Egger
- 22 April 2022
- book chapter
- Published by Wiley
- p. 74-90
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated ReviewPLOS ONE, 2013
- Positive Outcomes Influence the Rate and Time to Publication, but Not the Impact Factor of Publications of Clinical Trial ResultsPLOS ONE, 2013
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Detecting and adjusting for small‐study effects in meta‐analysisBiometrical Journal, 2011
- Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetryJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Publication bias in qualitative research: what becomes of qualitative research presented at conferences?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2008
- Application and investigation of a bound for outcome reporting biasTrials, 2007
- Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysisJAMA, 2006
- A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpointsStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004