The Biomechanical Properties of Meshed versus Perforated Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs)
Authors:
Open Access
- 11 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
- Vol. 9 (3) , e3454
Abstract
Background: Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are used for soft tissue augmentation across surgical specialties. Since allograft incorporation depends on direct opposition between the ADM and a vascular bed, seroma formation can be detrimental to incorporation. Since most ADM products are available in many meshed and perforated forms, there is a lack of consistency between manufacture designs. We set out to determine the fluid egress properties and increase in surface area resulting from common cut patterns. Methods: Three ADM cut patterns were studied: 1 meshed and 2 perforated. We calculated the surface area of these modified ADM samples. Fluid was passed through each ADM, and time required for fluid passage was recorded. An ANOVA (P < 0.05) was used to determine if there was a significant difference in egress properties across the 3 patterns. Results: Meshing in a 1:1 pattern resulted in a 97.50% increase in surface area compared with the uncut product. In comparison, only a 0.30% increase resulted from Perforation Pattern #1 and a 0.59% increase resulted from Perforation Pattern #2. There was a significant difference in egress properties across the three cut patterns (P = 0.000). The average egress time of Mesh Pattern #1 was 1.974 seconds. The average egress time of Perforation Pattern #2 was 6.504 seconds, and of Perforation Pattern #1 was 10.369 seconds. Conclusions: Quantitative comparison revealed that meshing ADM significantly improves fluid egress and increases the surface area. Therefore, the use of meshed ADM tissue could improve the incorporation of ADM with the recipient, with improved patient outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix Efficacy in Prosthesis-Based Breast ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2018
- What’s New in Acellular Dermal Matrix and Soft-Tissue Support for Prosthetic Breast ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2017
- Biological incorporation of human acellular dermal matrix used in Achilles tendon repairCell and Tissue Banking, 2017
- Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment and Prevention of Implant-Associated Breast DeformitiesPlastic Surgical Nursing, 2017
- Do Processing Methods Make a Difference in Acellular Dermal Matrix Properties?Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2016
- Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysisAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2015
- Minimizing Complications With the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Implant-Based Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2013
- Analysis of Acellular Dermal Matrix Integration and Revascularization following Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction in a Clinically Relevant Large-Animal ModelPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2013
- Complications of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast SurgeryPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
- Acellular Dermal Matrix: General Principles for the Plastic SurgeonAesthetic Surgery Journal, 2011