Reactivity of Judgments of Learning in a Levels-of-Processing Paradigm
Authors:
- 1 October 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Zeitschrift für Psychologie
- Vol. 228 (4) , 278-290
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that judgments of learning (JOLs) are reactive measures in paired-associate learning paradigms. However, evidence is scarce concerning whether JOLs are reactive in other paradigms. In old/new recognition experiments, we investigated the reactivity effects of JOLs in a levels-of-processing (LOP) paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, for each word, subjects saw a yes/no orienting question followed by the target word and a response. Then, they either did or did not make a JOL. The yes/no questions were about target words’ appearances, rhyming properties, or category memberships. In Experiment 3, for each word, subjects gave a pleasantness rating or counted the letter “e ”. Our results revealed that JOLs enhanced recognition across all orienting tasks in Experiments 1 and 2, and for the e-counting task in Experiment 3. This reactive effect was salient for shallow tasks, attenuating – but not eliminating – the LOP effect after making JOLs. We conclude that JOLs are reactive in LOP paradigms and subjects encode words more effectively when providing JOLs.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: A meta-analytic review.Psychological Bulletin, 2011
- Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: Effects on monitoring and controlPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2009
- The English Lexicon ProjectBehavior Research Methods, 2007
- A Region of Proximal Learning model of study time allocationJournal of Memory and Language, 2005
- Illusions of Competence in Monitoring One's Knowledge During Study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005
- When Predictions Create Reality: Judgments of Learning May Alter What They Are Intended to AssessPsychological Science, 1992
- Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.Psychology and Aging, 1989
- Subject reactivity in direct observational assessment: A review and critical analysisClinical Psychology Review, 1982
- Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969