Esophagectomy compared with chemoradiation for early stage esophageal cancer in the elderly
Open Access
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy has been the traditional treatment of choice for early stage esophageal cancer. However, esophagectomy is associated with high mortality and morbidity in the elderly, and these patients often receive chemoradiation instead. The authors of this report compared outcomes of esophagectomy versus chemoradiation in a population‐based sample of elderly patients with early stage esophageal cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results‐Medicare database was used to identify patients aged ≥65 years who were diagnosed with stage I or II esophageal cancer from 1991 to 2002. The associations of treatment with esophagectomy or chemoradiation were assessed along with demographic and clinical variables. A survival analyses was performed to compare outcomes with treatment modality and was adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty patients with stage I or II esophageal cancer were identified who underwent esophagectomy (n = 341; 46.7%) or chemoradiation (n = 389; 53.3%). Older age, squamous cell histology, and lower socioeconomic status were associated with increased odds of receiving chemoradiation. In multivariate analyses, chemoradiation was associated with worse disease‐specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64‐2.64) and overall survival (HR, 1.92; 95%CI, 1.58‐2.34). The receipt of chemoradiation was associated with worse survival for patients with adenocarcinoma (HR, 3.01; 95%CI, 2.24‐4.04), but there was no significant difference for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (HR, 1.33; 95%CI, 0.98‐1.80). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with chemoradiation, esophagectomy may be associated with improved survival for early stage esophageal cancer in the elderly. The current results suggest that there also may be a subset of patients with squamous cell carcinoma for whom chemoradiation is adequate therapy. A randomized trial would be useful to determine the optimal treatment for elderly patients with early stage esophageal cancer. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Systemic Disease in Patients With Esophageal Cancer After EsophagectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- Incidence of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus Among White Americans by Sex, Stage, and AgeJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Phase III Trial of Trimodality Therapy With Cisplatin, Fluorouracil, Radiotherapy, and Surgery Compared With Surgery Alone for Esophageal Cancer: CALGB 9781Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Cancer Statistics, 2008CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- Racial Disparities in Esophageal Cancer Treatment and OutcomesAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2007
- Racial disparities and socioeconomic status in association with survival in a large population‐based cohort of elderly patients with colon cancerCancer, 2007
- Referral Patterns, Treatment Choices, and Outcomes in Locoregional Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis of Elderly PatientsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Construct Validity of Medicare Chemotherapy ClaimsMedical Care, 2002
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987