Reliability, reproducibility and variability of the traditional Histologic/Histochemical Grading System vs the new OARSI Osteoarthritis Cartilage Histopathology Assessment System
Authors:
- L.B. CreemersLCL.B. Creemers
- A.J. VerboutAVA.J. Verbout
- M.H.P. van RijenMRM.H.P. van Rijen
- W.J.A. DhertWDW.J.A. Dhert
- D.B.F. SarisDSD.B.F. Saris
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
- Vol. 15 (11) , 1241-1248
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and stagingOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2006
- The Validity of the SRS-22 Instrument in an Adult Spinal Deformity Population Compared With the Oswestry and SF-12Spine, 2005
- The Correlation and Reproducibility of Histological Scoring Systems in Cartilage RepairTissue Engineering, 2002
- Validity of histopathological grading of articular cartilage from osteoarthritic knee jointsAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1999
- Histologic/histochemical grading system for osteoarthritic articular cartilage. Reproducibility and validityArthritis & Rheumatism, 1997
- The reliability of the mankin score for osteoarthritisJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1992
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- Biochemical and Metabolic Abnormalities in Articular Cartilage from Osteo-Arthritic Human HipsJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1971
- Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of TestsPsychometrika, 1951