Zinc and cadmium: XPS chemical state determination and auger peak curve-fitting procedures
Authors:
- Jeffrey D. HendersonJHJeffrey D. Henderson
- Sage D.C. BuchananSBSage D.C. Buchanan
- Lauren H. GreyLGLauren H. Grey
- Mark C. BiesingerMBMark C. Biesinger
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 12 February 2026
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Surface Science
- Vol. 730
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Ontario Research Foundation
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2022-04475)
This publication has 88 references indexed in Scilit:
- Speciation of Magnesium Surfaces by X‐Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)Surface and Interface Analysis, 2025
- Coupling of X‐AES Transitions and XPS Photopeaks to Assess the Oxide Formation of Ga and in CuIn 0.7 Ga 0.3 Se 2 Material During Air AgingSurface and Interface Analysis, 2025
- Enhancing Oxygen Spectra Interpretation by Calculating Oxygen Linked to Adventitious CarbonSurface and Interface Analysis, 2025
- X‐Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Analysis of Indium and Indium‐Containing CompoundsSurface and Interface Analysis, 2024
- XPS insights: Asymmetric peak shapes in XPSSurface and Interface Analysis, 2023
- A unified scale for the Auger parameter: Methodology and benefitsSurface and Interface Analysis, 2021
- Definition of a new (Doniach‐Sunjic‐Shirley) peak shape for fitting asymmetric signals applied to reduced graphene oxide/graphene oxide XPS spectraSurface and Interface Analysis, 2021
- Advanced analysis of copper X‐ray photoelectron spectraSurface and Interface Analysis, 2017
- Energy calibration secondary standards for X‐ray photoelectron spectrometersSurface and Interface Analysis, 1985
- Core level binding energy shifts in dilute tin alloysSurface and Interface Analysis, 1982