Urogenital function following robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background: Mixed results are reported on clinical and cancer outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (LRCS) compared with robotic rectal cancer surgery (RRCS). However, more favourable functional outcomes are reported following RRCS. This study compared urinary and sexual function following RRCS and LRCS in male and female patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of urinary and sexual function after RRCS and LRCS was performed following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, and registered prospectively with PROSPERO (ID:CRD42020164285). The functional outcome reporting tools most commonly included: the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Mean scores and changes in mean scores from baseline were analysed using RevMan version 5.3. Results: Ten studies were included reporting on 1286 patients. Some 672 patients underwent LRCS, of whom 380 (56.5 per cent) were men and 116 (17.3 per cent) were women (gender not specified in 176 patients, 26.2 per cent). A total of 614 patients underwent RRCS, of whom 356 (58.0 per cent) were men and 83 (13.5 per cent) were women (gender not specified in 175 patients, 28.5 per cent). Regarding urinary function in men at 6 months after surgery, IPSS scores were significantly better in the RRCS group than in the LRCS group (mean difference (MD) −1.36, 95 per cent c.i. −2.31 to −0.40; P = 0.005), a trend that persisted at 12 months (MD −1.08, −1.85 to −0.30; P = 0.007). ΔIIEF scores significantly favoured RRCS at 6 months [MD –3.11 (95%CI –5.77, –0.44) P <0.021] and 12 months [MD –2.76 (95%CI –3.63, –1.88) P <0.001] post-operatively. Mixed urinary and sexual function outcomes were reported for women. Conclusion: This meta-analysis identified more favourable urinary and erectile function in men who undergo robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Outcomes in women did not identify a consistently more favourable outcome in either group. As robotic rectal cancer surgery may offer more favourable functional outcomes it should be considered and discussed with patients.

This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit: