Bone‐anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness
Authors:
- John W. HouseJHJohn W. House
- Joe Walter KutzJKJoe Walter Kutz
- Janice ChungJCJanice Chung
- 3 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 120 (3) , 601-607
Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis: Determine the benefit of the bone‐anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in patients with unilateral deafness.Study Design: Retrospective case series and prospective questionnaire study at a tertiary referral center.Methods: Patients with unilateral deafness of various etiologies who were implanted with a BAHA (n = 126) or not implanted with a BAHA after a translabyrinthine craniotomy (n = 126) were mailed questionnaires. A total of 139 patients (55%) responded to the questionnaires. Patients who were implanted with a BAHA received a general questionnaire concerning BAHA usage, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire (SSQ). Patients not implanted with a BAHA received only the SSQ hearing questionnaire.Results: Patients with unilateral deafness demonstrated a benefit with BAHA use on the APHAB. Most improvement with the BAHA was seen in the Background Noise subscale, with a 17.4% improvement. Ease of Communication and Reverberation subscales also demonstrated an 11.6% and 13.2% benefit, respectively. Patients with a BAHA demonstrated better scores in the SSQ Speech subscale when compared to unilaterally deaf patients who did not have a BAHA, although this difference was not significant.Conclusions: The APHAB demonstrated significant benefit with the use of a BAHA in patients with unilateral deafness. Although the SSQ speech subscale showed overall improvement in auditory disability with the use of a BAHA, this difference was not significant. However, the SSQ hearing questionnaire demonstrated specific situations were the BAHA is most useful. Laryngoscope, 2010Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unilateral Deafness After Acoustic Neuroma SurgeryOtology & Neurotology, 2006
- Quality of Life After Acoustic Neuroma SurgeryOtology & Neurotology, 2006
- Amplification in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Deafness: Speech in Noise and Directional Hearing Effects with Bone-Anchored Hearing and Contralateral Routing of Signal AmplificationOtology & Neurotology, 2006
- Long-term Results of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Recipients Who Had Previously Used Air-Conduction Hearing AidsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 2005
- Functional Impairments Due to Unilateral DeafnessAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 2004
- The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)International Journal of Audiology, 2004
- Transcranial Contralateral Cochlear Stimulation in Unilateral DeafnessOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 2003
- Comparison of the Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Implantable Hearing Device with Contralateral Routing of Offside Signal Amplification in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral DeafnessOtology & Neurotology, 2003
- The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid BenefitEar & Hearing, 1995
- A Rehabilitative Approach to the Problem of Unilateral Hearing Impairment: The Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS)Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1965