Pockmarks in the Witch Ground Basin, Central North Sea
Authors:
- Christoph BöttnerChristoph Böttner
- Christian BerndtChristian Berndt
- Jacob GeersenJacob Geersen
- Jens KarstensJens Karstens
- Jonathan M. BullJonathan M. Bull
- Ben J. CallowBCBen J. Callow
- Anna LichtschlagAnna Lichtschlag
- Mark SchmidtMark Schmidt
- Judith ElgerJudith Elger
- Bettina SchrammBSBettina Schramm
- Matthias HaeckelMatthias Haeckel
Open Access
- 1 April 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Vol. 20 (4) , 1698-1719
Abstract
Marine sediments host large amounts of methane (CH4), which is a potent greenhouse gas. Quantitative estimates for methane release from marine sediments are scarce, and a poorly constrained temporal variability leads to large uncertainties in methane emission scenarios. Here, we use 2‐D and 3‐D seismic reflection, multibeam bathymetric, geochemical, and sedimentological data to (I) map and describe pockmarks in the Witch Ground Basin (central North Sea), (II) characterize associated sedimentological and fluid migration structures, and (III) analyze the related methane release. More than 1,500 pockmarks of two distinct morphological classes spread over an area of 225 km2. The two classes form independently from another and are corresponding to at least two different sources of fluids. Class 1 pockmarks are large in size (>6 m deep, >250 m long, and >75 m wide), show active venting, and are located above vertical fluid conduits that hydraulically connect the seafloor with deep methane sources. Class 2 pockmarks, which comprise 99.5% of all pockmarks, are smaller (0.9–3.1 m deep, 26–140 m long, and 14–57 m wide) and are limited to the soft, fine‐grained sediments of the Witch Ground Formation and possibly sourced by compaction‐related dewatering. Buried pockmarks within the Witch Ground Formation document distinct phases of pockmark formation, likely triggered by external forces related to environmental changes after deglaciation. Thus, greenhouse gas emissions from pockmark fields cannot be based on pockmark numbers and present‐day fluxes but require an analysis of the pockmark forming processes through geological time.Keywords
Funding Information
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (654462)
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review of submarine cold seep plumbing systems: leakage to seepage and ventingTerra Nova, 2012
- Depositional environments and chronology of Late Weichselian glaciation and deglaciation in the central North SeaBoreas, 2010
- Effects of rapid sedimentation on developing the Nyegga pockmark field: Constraints from hydrological modeling and 3‐D seismic data, offshore mid‐NorwayGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2009
- Pore pressure penetrometers document high overpressure near the seafloor where multiple submarine landslides have occurred on the continental slope, offshore Louisiana, Gulf of MexicoEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2008
- Reappraisal of the fossil methane budget and related emission from geologic sourcesGeophysical Research Letters, 2008
- ITRAX: description and evaluation of a new multi-function X-ray core scannerGeological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006
- Environmental overview of Eckernf rde Bay, northern GermanyGeo-Marine Letters, 1996
- A pockmark field in the Patras Gulf (Greece) and its activation during the 14/7/93 seismic eventMarine Geology, 1996
- Astomonema southwardorumsp. nov., a gutless nematode dominant in a methane seep area in the North SeaJournal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 1993
- Lower Pleistocene deltaic and marine sediments in boreholes from the central North SeaJournal of Quaternary Science, 1987