The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia
Open Access
- 4 December 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 18 (1) , 943
Abstract
We investigate whether the extent of educational inequalities in the use of Pap smears (cervical cancer screening) and mammograms (breast cancer screening) in Belgium has changed over time in accordance with the pattern predicted by diffusion of innovation theory, as well as how the regional cancer screening policies of Flanders and Wallonia influence this pattern. Data were obtained from five successive cross-sectional waves (1997–2001–2004-2008-2013) of the Belgian Health Interview Survey. Final sample sizes consisted of 8988 women aged 25–64 years for cervical cancer screening and 4194 women aged 50–69 years for breast cancer screening. We calculated absolute and relative measures of inequality, more specifically, the slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII), and their development over time. In both Flanders and Wallonia, mammogram use increased greatly between 1997 and 2013, while Pap smear use has remained quite stable over time. Educational inequalities in cervical-cancer screening have been largely persistent over time in both regions. In contrast, educational inequalities in breast cancer screening fluctuated more between 1997 and 2013. Between 1997 and 2001, when the breast cancer screening programme was implemented in Flanders, RII reduced significantly by 45%. Inequality measures did not change significantly in Wallonia, where it is known that most women are screened opportunistically outside the programme. By focussing on Belgium, this study demonstrates that regional variations in the support of a national screening programme can result in regional variations in the pattern of diffusion for cancer screening, as well as to the development of inequalities in cancer screening participation. Moreover, the findings demonstrate that high visibility and awareness of the screening programme, as was more the case in Flanders than it was in Wallonia, are required in order to reduce or eliminate educational inequalities in cancer screening participation over time. General practitioners and gynaecologists can play a decisive role in this regard.Keywords
Funding Information
- Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using multiple measures to assess changes in social inequalities for breast cancer screeningEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2013
- Who gets a mammogram amongst European women aged 50-69 years?Health Economics Review, 2012
- Trends in absolute and relative educational inequalities in four modifiable ischaemic heart disease risk factors: repeated cross-sectional surveys from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) 1984–2008BMC Public Health, 2012
- Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional studyBMC Public Health, 2012
- Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening ParticipationGastroenterology Research and Practice, 2012
- Variations in preventive care utilisation in EuropeEuropean Journal of Ageing, 2011
- The importance of socio-economic variables in cancer screening participation: A comparison between population-based and opportunistic screening in the EU-15Health Policy, 2011
- The challenges of organising cervical screening programmes in the 15 old member states of the European UnionEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2009
- How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidenceEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987–2000)Preventive Medicine, 2004