Evaluating Darwin’s Naturalization Hypothesis in Experimental Plant Assemblages: Phylogenetic Relationships Do Not Determine Colonization Success
Open Access
- 20 August 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 9 (8) , e105535
Abstract
Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis (DNH) proposes that colonization is less likely when the colonizing species is related to members of the invaded community, because evolutionary closeness intensifies competition among species that share similar resources. Studies that have evaluated DNH from correlational evidence have yielded controversial results with respect to its occurrence and generality. In the present study we carried out a set of manipulative experiments in which we controlled the phylogenetic relatedness of one colonizing species (Lactuca sativa) with five assemblages of plants (the recipient communities), and evaluated the colonizing success using five indicators (germination, growth, flowering, survival, and recruitment). The evolutionary relatedness was calculated as the mean phylogenetic distance between Lactuca and the members of each assemblage (MPD) and by the mean phylogenetic distance to the nearest neighbor (MNND). The results showed that the colonization success of Lactuca was not affected by MPD or MNND values, findings that do not support DNH. These results disagree with experimental studies made with communities of microorganisms, which show an inverse relation between colonization success and phylogenetic distances. We suggest that these discrepancies may be due to the high phylogenetic distance used, since in our experiments the colonizing species (Lactuca) was a distant relative of the assemblage members, while in the other studies the colonizing taxa have been related at the congeneric and conspecific levels. We suggest that under field conditions the phylogenetic distance is a weak predictor of competition, and it has a limited role in determining colonization success, contrary to prediction of the DNH. More experimental studies are needed to establish the importance of phylogenetic distance between colonizing species and invaded community on colonization success.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis up-close: Intermountain grassland invaders differ morphologically and phenologically from native community dominantsBiological Invasions, 2011
- Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communitiesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2011
- More closely related species are more ecologically similar in an experimental testProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IIIBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009
- Does Darwin’s Naturalization Hypothesis Explain Fish Invasions?Biological Invasions, 2006
- Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasiveProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the mapNature Reviews Microbiology, 2006
- Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystemsEcology Letters, 2004
- Darwin's Naturalization Hypothesis RevisitedThe American Naturalist, 2001
- Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000