Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer
Open Access
- 2 February 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medicine
- Vol. 20 (1) , 1-22
Abstract
Background: We aimed to map and describe the current state of Mendelian randomization (MR) literature on cancer risk and to identify associations supported by robust evidence. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus up to 06/10/2020 for MR studies investigating the association of any genetically predicted risk factor with cancer risk. We categorized the reported associations based on a priori designed levels of evidence supporting a causal association into four categories, namely robust, probable, suggestive, and insufficient, based on the significance and concordance of the main MR analysis results and at least one of the MR-Egger, weighed median, MRPRESSO, and multivariable MR analyses. Associations not presenting any of the aforementioned sensitivity analyses were not graded. Results: We included 190 publications reporting on 4667 MR analyses. Most analyses (3200; 68.6%) were not accompanied by any of the assessed sensitivity analyses. Of the 1467 evaluable analyses, 87 (5.9%) were supported by robust, 275 (18.7%) by probable, and 89 (6.1%) by suggestive evidence. The most prominent robust associations were observed for anthropometric indices with risk of breast, kidney, and endometrial cancers; circulating telomere length with risk of kidney, lung, osteosarcoma, skin, thyroid, and hematological cancers; sex steroid hormones and risk of breast and endometrial cancer; and lipids with risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer. Conclusions: Despite the large amount of research on genetically predicted risk factors for cancer risk, limited associations are supported by robust evidence for causality. Most associations did not present a MR sensitivity analysis and were thus non-evaluable. Future research should focus on more thorough assessment of sensitivity MR analyses and on more transparent reporting.Keywords
Funding Information
- Cancer Research UK (C18281/A29019)
- Wellcome Trust (204623/Z/16/Z)
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014)
- Cancer Research UK Career Development Fellowship (C31250/A22804)
This publication has 363 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficient Design for Mendelian Randomization Studies: Subsample and 2-Sample Instrumental Variable EstimatorsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated ReviewPLOS ONE, 2013
- Model Selection Approach Suggests Causal Association between 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Colorectal CancerPLOS ONE, 2013
- Instrumental Variable Estimation of the Causal Effect of Plasma 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin D on Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Mendelian Randomization AnalysisPLOS ONE, 2012
- The Association of Telomere Length and Cancer: a Meta-analysisCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2011
- Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next GenerationCell, 2011
- Genetic Susceptibility to Type 2 Diabetes Is Associated with Reduced Prostate Cancer RiskHuman Heredity, 2010
- Obesity and cancer: Mendelian randomization approach utilizing the FTO genotypeInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Mendelian Randomization: How It Can—and Cannot—Help Confirm Causal Relations between Nutrition and CancerCancer Prevention Research, 2009
- Estrogens and their receptors in breast cancer progression: a dual role in cancer proliferation and invasionCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2004