Proposing a social‐ecological framework for successful grassland restoration in Germany—an overview and insights from the Grassworks project
Authors:
- Vicky M. TempertonVTVicky M. Temperton
- Ioana A. Pătru‐DușeIPIoana A. Pătru‐Dușe
- Alina TwerskiATAlina Twerski
- Philipp LaesekePLPhilipp Laeseke
- Miguel A. Cebrián‐PiquerasMCMiguel A. Cebrián‐Piqueras
- Manuel Pacheco RomeroMRManuel Pacheco Romero
- Markus BauerMBMarkus Bauer
- Volker BeckmannVBVolker Beckmann
- Jörn FischerJFJörn Fischer
- Konrad GrayKGKonrad Gray
- Werner HärdtleWHWerner Härdtle
Open Access
- 9 July 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Restoration Ecology
- Vol. 33 (7)
Abstract
Introduction: Bending the biodiversity curve and meeting international commitments like the Kunming‐Montreal Agreement and the EU Nature Restoration Law require scaling up ecological restoration across spatial, temporal, and societal dimensions. Achieving this depends on a strong scientific evidence base and synthesis of effective practices from both ecological and social perspectives.Objectives: The Grassworks project investigates factors influencing grassland restoration success in Germany by integrating ecological, socioeconomic, and social‐ecological perspectives.Methods: We assessed previously restored grasslands across three regions along a north–south gradient in Germany, comparing them to reference sites. A stratified design evaluated restoration outcomes based on methods, past land use, management, governance, finance, and time since intervention. We analyzed vegetation, pollinators, soil, and economic performance while considering landscape configuration. Social‐ecological aspects, including stakeholder values, knowledge exchange, and decision‐making networks, were also examined. A Real‐World Laboratory approach integrated ex ante and ex post evaluations, demonstration sites, and co‐created restoration activities.Results: We propose a replicable, adaptable framework for social‐ecological restoration, synthesizing key ecological, economic, and social dimensions to support continuous learning and adaptive management, facilitating more effective and scalable restoration practices.Conclusions: Drawing from the Grassworks project, this research provides insights to inform and guide future large‐scale restoration efforts, promoting a holistic and evidence‐based approach to social‐ecological restoration worldwide.Keywords
This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensemaking and abductive reasoning for transformative biodiversity conservationPeople and Nature, 2025
- Changing the decision context to enable social learning for climate adaptationPeople and Nature, 2025
- Characterizing governance models for upscaling wetland restorationEnvironmental Management, 2025
- Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder worldSustainability Science, 2024
- Disrupting the opportunity narrative: navigating transformation in times of uncertainty and crisisSustainability Science, 2023
- Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for changeSustainability Science, 2021
- Grasslands—more important for ecosystem services than you might thinkEcosphere, 2019
- An applied methodology for stakeholder identification in transdisciplinary researchSustainability Science, 2016
- Leverage points for sustainability transformationAMBIO, 2016
- The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making2001