Work Pressure and Patient Flow Management in the Emergency Department: Findings From an Ethnographic Study
Authors:
- Peter NugusPNPeter Nugus
- Anna HoldgateAHAnna Holdgate
- Margaret FryMFMargaret Fry
- Roberto ForeroRFRoberto Forero
- Sally McCarthySMSally McCarthy
- Jeffrey BraithwaiteJBJeffrey Braithwaite
Open Access
- 13 October 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 18 (10) , 1045-1052
Abstract
Academic Emergency Medicine 2011; 18:1045–1052 © 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Objectives: In this hypothesis‐generating study, we observe, identify, and analyze how emergency clinicians seek to manage work pressure to maximize patient flow in an environment characterized by delayed patient admissions (access block) and emergency department (ED) crowding.Methods: An ethnographic approach was used, which involved direct observation of on‐the‐ground behaviors, when and where they happened. More than 1,600 hours over a 12‐month period were spent observing approximately 4,500 interactions across approximately 260 emergency physicians and nurses, emergency clinicians, and clinicians from other hospital departments. The authors content analyzed and thematically analyzed more than 800 pages of field notes to identify indicators of and responses to pressure in the day‐to‐day ED work environment.Results: In response to the inability to control inflow, and the reactions of inpatient departments to whom patients might be transferred, emergency clinicians: reconciled urgency and acuity of conditions; negotiated and determined patients’ admission–discharge status early in their trajectories; pursued predetermined but coevolving pathways in response to micro‐ and macroflow problems; and exercised flexibility to reduce work pressure by managing scarce time and space in the ED.Conclusions: To redress the linearity of most literature on patient flow, this study adopts a systems perspective and ethnographic methods to bring to light the dynamic role that individuals play, interacting with their work contexts, to maintain patient flow. The study provides an empirical foundation, uniquely discernible through qualitative research, about aspects of ED work that previously have been the subject only of discussion or commentary articles. This study provides empirical documentation of the moment‐to‐moment responses of emergency clinicians to work pressure brought about by factors outside much of their control, establishing the relationship between patient flow and work pressure. We conceptualize the ED as a dynamic system, combining socioprofessional influences to reduce and control work pressure in the ED. Interventions in education, practice, policy, and organizational performance evaluations will be supported by this systematic documentation of the complexity of emergency clinical work. Future research involves testing the five findings using systems dynamic modeling techniques.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managing Health Care Decisions and Improvement Through Simulation ModelingQuality Management in Health Care, 2011
- Integrated care in the emergency department: A complex adaptive systems perspectiveSocial Science & Medicine, 2010
- The dynamic interaction of quality and efficiency in the emergency department: Squaring the circle?Social Science & Medicine, 2010
- Selling patientsBMJ, 2009
- Impact of a Triage Liaison Physician on Emergency Department Overcrowding and Throughput: A Randomized Controlled TrialAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2007
- Developing operating principles for systems changeAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 2007
- An Empirical Assessment of Social Structural and Cultural Change in Clinical DirectoratesHealth Care Analysis, 2006
- 92: Prolonged Emergency Department Length Of Stay Is Associated with Worse Guideline Compliance and Increased Adverse EventsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Burnout, psychological morbidity, job satisfaction, and stress: a survey of Canadian hospital based child protection professionalsArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2005
- Managing complexity: acknowledge the attraction patterns by supporting sensemaking and allowing the quality system to serve as the panoptic systemInternational Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2002