Explaining large-N cooperation: Generalized social trust and the social exchange heuristic
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Rationality and Society
- Vol. 23 (1) , 51-74
Abstract
This paper presents a new argument that links generalized social trust and collective action in situations with a large number of actors who do not have specific information on each other. Generalized social trust enhances large-N cooperation through the social exchange heuristic, which stimulates conditional cooperation in social dilemmas. Using data from a survey in four countries and recycling behavior as an indicator of collective action, this explanation is tested with individual-level data. While the relationship between generalized social trust and large-N collective action is often hypothesized, there is scant micro-level evidence as it has mainly been tested at the macro level. The results show that people holding generalized social trust cooperate more readily in large-N dilemmas, and that they most likely do so because of the social exchange heuristic.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Corruption and Social TrustRationality and Society, 2009
- Attitudinal and Community Influences on Participation in New Curbside Recycling Initiatives in Northern IrelandEnvironment and Behavior, 2007
- Institutions and TrustRationality and Society, 2007
- Collaborative Watershed Management: A View from the GrassrootsPolicy Studies Journal, 2004
- Altruistic, Egoistic, and Normative Effects on Curbside RecyclingEnvironment and Behavior, 2001
- Cooperation, Reciprocity, and the Collective-Action HeuristicAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2001
- Measuring Trust*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000
- Liberty against the democratic state: on the historical and contemporary sources of American distrust1999
- RECIPROCITY, TRUST, AND THE SENSE OF CONTROLRationality and Society, 1999
- Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of IndividualsAmerican Sociological Review, 1950