Ampicillin-Sulbactam and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Susceptibility Testing of Escherichia coli Isolates with Different β-Lactam Resistance Phenotypes
Authors:
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 43 (4) , 862-867
Abstract
The activities of ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate were studied with 100 selected clinical Escherichia coli isolates with different β-lactam susceptibility phenotypes by standard agar dilution and disk diffusion techniques and with a commercial microdilution system (PASCO). A fixed ratio (2:1) and a fixed concentration (clavulanate, 2 and 4 μg/ml; sulbactam, 8 μg/ml) were used in the agar dilution technique. The resistance frequencies for amoxicillin-clavulanate with different techniques were as follows: fixed ratio agar dilution, 12%; fixed concentration 4-μg/ml agar dilution, 17%; fixed ratio microdilution, 9%; and disk diffusion, 9%. Marked discrepancies were found when these results were compared with those obtained with ampicillin-sulbactam (26 to 52% resistance), showing that susceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid cannot be predicted by testing the isolate against ampicillin-sulbactam. Interestingly, the discrimination between susceptible and intermediate isolates was better achieved with 4 μg of clavulanate per ml than with the fixed ratio. In contrast, amoxicillin susceptibility was not sufficiently restored when 2 μg of clavulanate per ml was used, particularly in moderate (mean β-lactamase activity, 50.8 mU/mg of protein) and high-level (215 mU/mg) TEM-1 β-lactamase producer isolates. Four micrograms of clavulanate per milliliter could be a reasonable alternative to the 2:1 fixed ratio, because most high-level β-lactamase-hyperproducing isolates would be categorized as nonsusceptible, and low- and moderate-level β-lactamase-producing isolates would be categorized as nonresistant. This approach cannot be applied to sulbactam, either with the fixed 2:1 ratio or with the 8-μg/ml fixed concentration, because many low-level β-lactamase-producing isolates would be classified in the resistant category. These findings call for a review of breakpoints for β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- β-Lactam stability in frozen microdilution PASCO MIC panels using strains with known resistance mechanisms as biosensorsDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1996
- Cefuroxime resistance in Escherichia coli:APMIS, 1996
- Fixed or variable concentrations of βlactamase inhibitors in in-vitro tests?Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1996
- Comparison of fixed concentration and fixed ratio options for dilution susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli to ampicillin and ampicillin/sulbactamEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1993
- Activity of clavulanate combinations against TEM-1 β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates obtained in 1982 and 1989Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1991
- Beta-lactamase types and beta-lactam resistance ofEscherichia coli strains with chromosomally mediated ampicillin resistanceEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1990
- Evolution and spread of tetracycline resistance determinantsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1989
- RESISTANCE TO BETA-LACTAM/CLAVULANATEThe Lancet, 1987
- Variation in the potentiation of β-lactam antibiotic activity by clavulanic acid and sulbactam against multiply antibiotic-resistant bacteriaJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1986
- Frequency of plasmid-determined beta-lactamases in 680 consecutively isolated strains ofEnterobacteriaceaeEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1985