Distill-and-Compare: Auditing Black-Box Models Using Transparent Model Distillation
Authors:
- Sarah TanSTSarah Tan
- Rich CaruanaRCRich Caruana
- Giles HookerGHGiles Hooker
- Yin LouYLYin Lou
Preprint
Abstract
Black-box risk scoring models permeate our lives, yet are typically proprietary or opaque. We propose Distill-and-Compare, a model distillation and comparison approach to audit such models. To gain insight into black-box models, we treat them as teachers, training transparent student models to mimic the risk scores assigned by black-box models. We compare the student model trained with distillation to a second un-distilled transparent model trained on ground-truth outcomes, and use differences between the two models to gain insight into the black-box model. Our approach can be applied in a realistic setting, without probing the black-box model API. We demonstrate the approach on four public data sets: COMPAS, Stop-and-Frisk, Chicago Police, and Lending Club. We also propose a statistical test to determine if a data set is missing key features used to train the black-box model. Our test finds that the ProPublica data is likely missing key feature(s) used in COMPAS.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Auditing black-box models for indirect influenceKnowledge and Information Systems, 2017
- Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness2017
- Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction InstrumentsBig Data, 2017
- Classification methods applied to credit scoring: Systematic review and overall comparisonSurveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 2016
- Precinct or prejudice? Understanding racial disparities in New York City’s stop-and-frisk policyThe Annals of Applied Statistics, 2016
- Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact2015
- A peek into the black box: exploring classifiers by randomizationData Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2014
- Accurate intelligible models with pairwise interactions2013
- Intelligible models for classification and regression2012
- Standard errors for bagged and random forest estimatorsComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2009