Uninsured Primary Care Visit Disparities Under the Affordable Care Act
Open Access
- 11 September 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Annals of Family Medicine in The Annals of Family Medicine
- Vol. 15 (5) , 434-442
Abstract
PURPOSE Health insurance coverage affects a patient’s ability to access optimal care, the percentage of insured patients on a clinic’s panel has an impact on the clinic’s ability to provide needed health care services, and there are racial and ethnic disparities in coverage in the United States. Thus, we aimed to assess changes in insurance coverage at community health center (CHC) visits after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion by race and ethnicity. METHODS We undertook a retrospective, observational study of visit payment type for CHC patients aged 19 to 64 years. We used electronic health record data from 10 states that expanded Medicaid and 6 states that did not, 359 CHCs, and 870,319 patients with more than 4 million visits. Our analyses included difference-in-difference (DD) and difference-in-difference-in-difference (DDD) estimates via generalized estimating equation models. The primary outcome was health insurance type at each visit (Medicaid-insured, uninsured, or privately insured). RESULTS After the ACA was implemented, uninsured visit rates decreased for all racial and ethnic groups. Hispanic patients experienced the greatest increases in Medicaid-insured visit rates after ACA implementation in expansion states (rate ratio [RR] = 1.77; 95% CI, 1.56–2.02) and the largest gains in privately insured visit rates in nonexpansion states (RR = 3.63; 95% CI, 2.73–4.83). In expansion states, non-Hispanic white patients had twice the magnitude of decrease in uninsured visits compared with Hispanic patients (DD = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.53–2.70), and this relative change was more than 2 times greater in expansion states compared with nonexpansion states (DDD = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.52–2.78). CONCLUSION The lower rates of uninsured visits for all racial and ethnic groups after ACA implementation suggest progress in expanding coverage to CHC patients; this progress, however, was not uniform when comparing expansion with nonexpansion states and among all racial and ethnic minority subgroups. These findings suggest the need for continued and more equitable insurance expansion efforts to eliminate health insurance disparities.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Gaining Insurance Coverage on Smoking Cessation in Community Health Centers: A Cohort StudyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2016
- Early Coverage, Access, Utilization, and Health Effects Associated With the Affordable Care Act Medicaid ExpansionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2016
- Community Health Centers And Medicaid At 50: An Enduring Relationship Essential For Health System TransformationHealth Affairs, 2015
- Receipt of Diabetes Preventive Services Differs by Insurance Status at VisitAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2015
- An Early Look at Rates of Uninsured Safety Net Clinic Visits After the Affordable Care ActThe Annals of Family Medicine, 2015
- Estimating Demand for Care After a Medicaid ExpansionJournal of Ambulatory Care Management, 2014
- Insurance Continuity and Receipt of Diabetes Preventive Care in a Network of Federally Qualified Health CentersMedical Care, 2009
- The Role of Community Health Centers in Delivering Primary Care to the UnderservedJournal of Ambulatory Care Management, 2007
- Insurance Status and Access to Urgent Ambulatory Care Follow-up AppointmentsJAMA, 2005
- Socioeconomic Status and Risk for Substandard Medical CareJAMA, 1992