Cell-Free Protein Expression under Macromolecular Crowding Conditions
Authors:
Open Access
- 8 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (12) , e28707
Abstract
Cell-free protein expression (CFPE) comprised of in vitro transcription and translation is currently manipulated in relatively dilute solutions, in which the macromolecular crowding effects present in living cells are largely ignored. This may not only affect the efficiency of protein synthesis in vitro, but also limit our understanding of the functions and interactions of biomolecules involved in this fundamental biological process. Using cell-free synthesis of Renilla luciferase in wheat germ extract as a model system, we investigated the CFPE under macromolecular crowding environments emulated with three different crowding agents: PEG-8000, Ficoll-70 and Ficoll-400, which vary in chemical properties and molecular size. We found that transcription was substantially enhanced in the macromolecular crowding solutions; up to 4-fold increase in the mRNA production was detected in the presence of 20% (w/v) of Ficoll-70. In contrast, translation was generally inhibited by the addition of each of the three crowding agents. This might be due to PEG-induced protein precipitation and non-specific binding of translation factors to Ficoll molecules. We further explored a two-stage CFPE in which transcription and translation was carried out under high then low macromolecular crowding conditions, respectively. It produced 2.2-fold higher protein yield than the coupled CFPE control. The macromolecular crowding effects on CFPE were subsequently confirmed by cell-free synthesis of an approximately two-fold larger protein, Firefly luciferase, under macromolecular crowding environments. Three macromolecular crowding agents used in this research had opposite effects on transcription and translation. The results of this study should aid researchers in their choice of macromolecular crowding agents and shows that two-stage CFPE is more efficient than coupled CFPE.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Models of macromolecular crowding effects and the need for quantitative comparisons with experimentCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology, 2010
- Effect of Macromolecular Crowding on Protein Folding Dynamics at the Secondary Structure LevelJournal of Molecular Biology, 2009
- Macromolecular crowding induced elongation and compaction of single DNA molecules confined in a nanochannelProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Effect of Macromolecular Crowding on Reaction Rates: A Computational and Theoretical StudyBiophysical Journal, 2009
- Macromolecular crowding in vitro as means of emulating cellular interiors: When less might be moreProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Macromolecular crowding and its potential impact on nuclear functionBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, 2008
- An integrated cell‐free metabolic platform for protein production and synthetic biologyMolecular Systems Biology, 2008
- Regulation of DNA nucleases by molecular crowdingNucleic Acids Research, 2007
- Troubleshooting coupled in vitro transcription–translation system derived from Escherichia coli cells: synthesis of high-yield fully active proteinsNucleic Acids Research, 2006
- Towards synthesis of a minimal cellMolecular Systems Biology, 2006