Positive Surgical Margins at Partial Nephrectomy: Predictors and Oncological Outcomes
Authors:
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 179 (6) , 2158-2163
Abstract
The prognostic significance and optimal management of positive surgical margins following partial nephrectomy remain ill-defined. We combine data from 2 tertiary care intuitions, and report predictors of positive surgical margins and long-term oncological outcomes for patients with positive surgical margins. Clinical, pathological and followup data on 1,344 patients undergoing 1,390 partial nephrectomies for kidney cancer were analyzed. Patients with positive surgical margins on final pathology were treated expectantly. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were fit to determine clinicopathological features associated with positive surgical margins. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate freedom from local disease recurrence and metastatic progression. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess whether positive surgical margin predicted local recurrence or metastatic disease adjusting for tumor size, pathological stage, histological subtype and presence of a solitary kidney. Positive surgical margins were documented in 77 cases (5.5%). Decreasing tumor size and presence of a solitary kidney carried a significantly higher risk of positive surgical margins. The overall 10-year probability of freedom from local disease recurrence was 93% (95% CI 89, 95) and from metastatic progression 93% (95% CI 90, 95), with no significant difference between patients with positive vs negative margins (p = 0.97 and 0.18, respectively). Positive surgical margins were not associated with an increased risk of local recurrence or metastatic disease. Positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy specimens do not uniformly portend an adverse prognosis. While every effort should be taken to ensure clear margins, our data suggest that select patients with a positive surgical margin can be safely offered vigilant monitoring without compromising long-term disease-free survival.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simple Enucleation for the Treatment of PT1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Our 20-Year ExperienceEuropean Urology, 2006
- Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2006
- Simple Enucleation for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma Between 4 and 7 cm in Greatest Dimension: Progression and Long-Term SurvivalJournal of Urology, 2006
- Prospective study of safety margins in partial nephrectomy: Intraoperative assessment and contribution of frozen section analysisUrology, 2006
- Comparison of outcomes in elective partial vs radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma of 4–7 cmBJU International, 2006
- COMPLICATIONS OF CONTEMPORARY OPEN NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY: A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, 2005
- SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR ALL T1 TUMORS BASED ON AN INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTER EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, 2004
- Nephron Sparing Surgery for Appropriately Selected Renal Cell Carcinoma Between 4 and 7 Cm Results in Outcome Similar to Radical NephrectomyJournal of Urology, 2004
- Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinomaUrology, 2002
- Matched Comparison of Radical Nephrectomy vs Nephron-Sparing Surgery in Patients With Unilateral Renal Cell Carcinoma and a Normal Contralateral KidneyMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2000