Designing a conservation area network that supports the representation and persistence of freshwater biodiversity
- 13 December 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Freshwater Biology
- Vol. 56 (1) , 106-124
Abstract
Summary: 1. The progression of approaches in systematic conservation planning from representation to representation and persistence has greatly enhanced its potential applicability to freshwaters. However, conceptual frameworks that consolidate principles for incorporating persistence into freshwater conservation planning are still lacking.2. We present four key principles to consider when planning for the persistence of freshwater biodiversity: selecting ecosystems of high ecological integrity; incorporating connectivity; incorporating areas important to population persistence; and identifying additional natural processes that can be mapped.3. The practicalities of gathering data and conducting the conservation plan to address these principles are explored here using a case study in the Olifants/Doorn Water Management Area, South Africa. Spatial layers are developed for depicting ecological integrity, sub‐catchment boundaries, riparian zones and wetlands, high water‐yield areas and patterns of groundwater discharge and recharge.4. These data are used to develop a conservation area network that supports both representation and persistence of freshwater biodiversity. Although the planning region is relatively data rich by global standards, several data deficiencies were identified. We suggest ways of using environmental surrogates to address data deficiencies, improving confidence in these surrogates by combining them wherever possible with existing field data and expert knowledge.5. We also recommend methods to achieve spatial efficiency by simultaneously designing for representation and persistence of freshwater biodiversity. Spatial efficiency can be achieved in different ways when using a conservation planning algorithm and a multiple‐use zoning strategy.6. The allocation of multiple‐use zones aligns closely with the objectives of integrated water resources management and land use planning. Given the practicalities at local levels of planning, we recommend using multiple‐use zones in the design phase, rather than merely at the end once the design is complete.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Freshwater conservation planning: the case for systematic approachesFreshwater Biology, 2010
- Scale‐based freshwater conservation planning: towards protecting freshwater biodiversity in KwaZulu‐Natal, South AfricaFreshwater Biology, 2010
- Applying systematic conservation planning principles to palustrine and inland saline wetlands of New ZealandFreshwater Biology, 2010
- Developing products for conservation decision‐making: lessons from a spatial biodiversity assessment for South AfricaDiversity and Distributions, 2007
- Rivers in peril inside and outside protected areas: a systematic approach to conservation assessment of river ecosystemsDiversity and Distributions, 2007
- Freshwater conservation planning in data-poor areas: An example from a remote Amazonian basin (Madre de Dios River, Peru and Bolivia)Biological Conservation, 2007
- Management options for river conservation planning: condition and conservation re‐visitedFreshwater Biology, 2007
- From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable system of conservation areas in the species‐rich mediterranean‐climate desert of southern AfricaDiversity and Distributions, 1999
- Protection of Aquatic Biodiversity in California: A Five-tiered ApproachFisheries, 1994
- Ecoregions of the Conterminous United StatesAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 1987