SEDUCTIONS OF METHOD: REJOINDER TO NAGIN AND TREMBLAY'S “DEVELOPMENTAL TRAJECTORY GROUPS: FACT OR FICTION?”*
Authors:
- John H. LaubJLJohn H. Laub
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Criminology
- Vol. 43 (4) , 905-913
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- DEVELOPMENTAL TRAJECTORY GROUPS: FACT OR A USEFUL STATISTICAL FICTION?*Criminology, 2005
- How Do We Study “What Happens Next”?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2005
- Response to “Methodological Sensitivities to Latent Class Analysis of Long-Term Criminal Trajectories”Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2004
- Methodological Sensitivities to Latent Class Analysis of Long-Term Criminal TrajectoriesJournal of Quantitative Criminology, 2004
- LIFE‐COURSE DESISTERS? TRAJECTORIES OF CRIME AMONG DELINQUENT BOYS FOLLOWED TO AGE 70*Criminology, 2003
- Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: A group-based method.Psychological Methods, 2001
- Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: A group-based method.Psychological Methods, 2001
- Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach.Psychological Methods, 1999
- Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy.Psychological Review, 1993
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983