Federal health workforce policy in Australia and its implications: a descriptive policy document review
Open Access
- 17 August 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 223 (9) , 459-466
Abstract
Objective: To identify which federal health workforce policies are current in Australia, and describe their mode, scope, and focus. Study design: Descriptive policy document review; categorisation according to the Howlett–Ramesh policy instrument framework. Setting: Health workforce policy documents available on the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care website, 1 June – 31 October 2024. Main outcome measures: Primary policy focus (specific health profession, population group or location); scope of policy (alignment with one or more strategic domains: supply, distribution, or performance), service sectors affected by policy, substantive mention of specific health professions; policy instrument types. Results: We included 121 policy documents in our analysis. By policy group, the number of documents was greatest for the rural health workforce (35), aged care (22), and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workforce (19); the numbers were lowest for pharmacy (three) and allied health (one), and none had public health or emergency care as their focus. Mixed policy instruments (multiple interest group programs, sub‐programs, incentives, grants) were more numerous (98 documents) than government‐led instruments (23 documents). Health workforce supply was a focus of 72 documents, performance of 57 documents, and distribution of 42 documents. Document nomenclature was inconsistent; 44 documents had policy labels that did not correspond to their content or purpose. Conclusion: We identified substantial fragmentation in Australian federal health workforce policy. The absence of a unified federal health workforce strategy exacerbates policy fragmentation, undermining coordinated workforce planning and equity. Adopting a consistent policy nomenclature and reducing imbalances in strategic focus are critical for effective health workforce reform. Our findings provide a baseline for analyses of policy processes and governance in Australian health workforce policymaking.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT2034261)
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Workforce nurturing: an approach to improving wellbeing, burnout and professional fulfilment among Australian doctorsInternational Journal of Medical Education, 2024
- The Australian health workforce: Disproportionate shortfalls in small rural townsAustralian Journal of Rural Health, 2024
- Factors Associated With Intent to Leave the Profession for the Allied Health Workforce: A Rapid ReviewMedical Care Research and Review, 2023
- Theorizing reactive policy entrepreneurship: A case study of Swedish local emergency managementPolicy Studies Journal, 2023
- Health workforce shortage – doing the right things or doing things right?Croatian Medical Journal, 2022
- From policy entrepreneurs to policy entrepreneurship: actors and actions in public policy innovationPolicy & Politics, 2021
- Remote health workforce turnover and retention: what are the policy and practice priorities?Human Resources for Health, 2019
- The Importance of Policy Change for Addressing Public Health ProblemsPublic Health Reports®, 2018
- Towards best practice in national health workforce planningMedical Journal of Australia, 2013
- Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2005