A non-invasive method for the assessment of gingival thickness in the aesthetic zone and the concept of the gingival geometric ratio in an Asian population
Authors:
- 24 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Vol. 52 (3) , 396-403
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methodsClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2018
- Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post‐extraction in esthetic sitesPeriodontology 2000, 2016
- Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late?Periodontology 2000, 2016
- A Non-Invasive and Accurate Measurement of Gingival Thickness Using Cone-Beam Computerized Imaging for the Assessment of Planning Immediate Implant in the Esthetic Zone—A Pig Jaw ModelImplant Dentistry, 2016
- Esthetic Outcomes Following Immediate and Early Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla—A Systematic ReviewThe International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2014
- The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingivaJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2009
- Soft Tissue Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography: A Novel Method for the Measurement of Gingival Tissue and the Dimensions of the Dentogingival UnitJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2008
- Ridge Preservation with Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft and a Collagen Membrane Compared to Extraction Alone for Implant Site Development: A Clinical and Histologic Study in HumansJournal of Periodontology, 2003
- Altering Gingival Levels: The Restorative Connection Part I: Biologic VariablesJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 1994
- Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implantsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1989