Justice for Whom, Exactly? Beliefs in Justice for the Self and Various Others
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 34 (4) , 528-541
Abstract
The present studies examine why people think the world is more just to themselves than to others generally. Beliefs in justice for the self were uniquely associated with psychological adjustment, consistent with the theoretical motive to believe in justice for the self (Studies 1 and 2). However, this “justice motive” did not appear to affect the relative strength of justice beliefs. Instead, self–other differences in justice beliefs appeared to reflect objective assessments of the justice received by various demographics. Undergraduates believed the world to be more just to themselves than to others but not their undergraduate peers specifically (Study 1). Participants of both genders believed the world to be more just to men, and to themselves, than to women (Study 2). Women did not exempt themselves individually from injustice but believed, similar to men, that undergraduate women receive as much justice as men (Study 3).Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisonersJournal of Research in Personality, 2005
- Exposure to Benevolent Sexism and Complementary Gender Stereotypes: Consequences for Specific and Diffuse Forms of System Justification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005
- Purpose in life as a mediator of adjustment after spinal cord injury.Rehabilitation Psychology, 2003
- Why minority group members perceive or do not perceive the discrimination that confronts them: The role of self-esteem and perceived control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- What Does the Belief in a Just World Protect Us From: The Dread of Death or the Fear of Understanding Suffering?Psychological Inquiry, 1997
- Nonunique Invulnerability: Singular versus Distributional Probabilities and Unrealistic Optimism in Comparative Risk JudgmentsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale.Psychological Assessment, 1993
- A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social IdentityPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1992
- The purpose-in-life test in an inmate population: An empirical investigationJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1977
- Purpose in life as related to specific valuesJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1975