A multicenter post‐marketing evaluation of the Elixir DESolve® Novolimus‐eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: First results from the DESolve PMCF study
- 6 March 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 92 (6) , 1021-1027
Abstract
Objectives: To date, experience with bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) that elute agents other than everolimus is limited. Thus, a post‐marketing clinical follow‐up study was conducted to evaluate the continued safety and effectiveness of the DESolve® NOVOLIMUS™ Eluting BRS as treatment for patients with stable coronary artery disease.Background: The DESolve BRS combines a poly‐l‐lactide‐based backbone with a biodegradable polylactide‐based polymer and Novolimus, a macrocyclic lactone mTOR inhibitor.Methods: One hundred and two patients (mean age 62 years, 77.5% male) were enrolled at 10 European sites. Comparison of baseline and post‐procedural angiographic assessment was performed, and a device‐oriented composite endpoint (comprising cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization) and rate of scaffold thrombosis at 12 months were examined.Results: The device was successfully delivered and deployed in 98.2% (107/109) of the lesions, with two failures to cross the lesion. A total of 100 patients (109 lesions) were treated with a DESolve BRS. Post‐procedural angiographic assessment indicated an in‐scaffold acute gain of 1.54 ± 0.44 mm, with a reduction in % diameter stenosis from 61.00 ± 11.29 to 12.69 ± 0.44. At 12 months, the device‐oriented composite endpoint had occurred in 3.0% (3/100) of patients, with 1.0% (1/100) experiencing scaffold thrombosis and myocardial infarction and 3.0% (3/100) undergoing target lesion revascularization. There were no cardiac deaths.Conclusions: Results through 12 months indicate that the DESolve BRS is a safe and effective treatment for coronary lesions, though larger, long‐term prospective studies are needed.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Midterm clinical outcomes with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents for percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomised trialsEuroIntervention, 2018
- Serial Multimodality Imaging and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Novel DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System for the Treatment of Single De Novo Coronary LesionsJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2016
- Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery DiseaseJACC, 2015
- Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB JapanEuropean Heart Journal, 2015
- An independent bench comparison of two bioresorbable drug-eluting coronary scaffolds (Absorb and DESolve) with a durable metallic drug-eluting stent (ML8/Xpedition)EuroIntervention, 2015
- Five-Year Clinical and Functional Multislice Computed Tomography Angiographic Results After Coronary Implantation of the Fully Resorbable Polymeric Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold in Patients With De Novo Coronary Artery DiseaseJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2013
- EVALUATION OF THE ABSORB EVEROLIMUS ELUTING BIORESORBABLE VASCULAR SCAFFOLD (ABSORB BVS) IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DE NOVO NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS: 2 YEAR CLINICAL RESULTS OF ABSORB COHORT B TRIALJACC, 2012
- Pathological Correlates of Late Drug-Eluting Stent ThrombosisCirculation, 2007
- Pathology of Drug-Eluting Stents in HumansJACC, 2006