Methods for the Best Evidence Synthesis on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders
Authors:
- Linda J. CarrollLCLinda J. Carroll
- J David CassidyJCJ David Cassidy
- Paul M. PelosoPPPaul M. Peloso
- Lori Giles-SmithLGLori Giles-Smith
- C Sam ChengCCC Sam Cheng
- Stephen W. GreenhalghSGStephen W. Greenhalgh
- Scott HaldemanSHScott Haldeman
- Gabrielle van der VeldeGVGabrielle van der Velde
- Eric L. HurwitzEHEric L. Hurwitz
- Pierre CôtéPCPierre Côté
- Margareta NordinMNMargareta Nordin
- Sheilah Hogg-JohnsonSHSheilah Hogg-Johnson
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 33 (Supplement) , S33-S38
Abstract
Best evidence synthesis. To provide a detailed description of the methods undertaken in a systematic search and perform a best evidence synthesis on the frequency, determinants, assessment, interventions, course and prognosis of neck pain, and its associated disorders. Neck pain is an important cause of health burden; however, the published information is vast, and stakeholders would benefit from a summary of the best evidence. The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders conducted a systematic search and critical review of the literature published between 1980 and 2006 to assemble the best evidence on neck pain. Citations were screened for relevance to the Neck Pain Task Force mandate, using a priori criteria, and relevant studies were critically reviewed for their internal scientific validity. Findings from studies meeting criteria for scientific validity were synthesized into a best evidence synthesis. We found 31,878 citations, of which 1203 were relevant to the mandate of the Neck Pain Task Force. After critical review, 552 studies (46%) were judged scientifically admissible and were compiled into the best evidence synthesis. The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders undertook a best evidence synthesis to establish a baseline of the current best evidence on the epidemiology, assessment and classification of neck pain, as well as interventions and prognosis for this symptom. This article reports the methods used and the outcomes from the review. We found that 46% of the research literature was of acceptable scientific quality to inform clinical practice, policy-making, and future research.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Burden and Determinants of Neck Pain in WorkersSpine, 2008
- The Burden and Determinants of Neck Pain in the General PopulationSpine, 2008
- The Sensitivity of Review Results to Methods Used to Appraise and Incorporate Trial Quality Into Data SynthesisSpine, 2007
- Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND StatementAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2004
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiativeBMJ, 2003
- Case series and exposure series: the role of studies without controls in providing information about the etiology of injury or diseaseInjury Prevention, 1998
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- Statement and Editorial BoardSpine, 1995
- Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional ReviewsEducational Researcher, 1986