Randomized Controlled Trial of the ShangRing for Adult Medical Male Circumcision: Safety, Effectiveness, and Acceptability of Using 7 Versus 14 Device Sizes
Open Access
- 1 June 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Vol. 72 (1) , S30-S35
Abstract
To assess the safety, effectiveness, and acceptability of providing a reduced number of ShangRing sizes for adult voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) within routine service delivery in Lusaka, Zambia. We conducted a randomized controlled trial and enrolled 500 HIV-negative men aged 18–49 years at 3 clinics. Participants were randomized to 1 of 2 study arms (Standard Sizing arm vs Modified Sizing arm) in a 1:1 ratio. All 14 adult ShangRing sizes (40–26 mm inner diameter, each varying by 1 mm) were available in the Standard Sizing arm; the Modified Sizing arm used every other size (40, 38, 36, 34, 32, 30, 28 mm inner diameter). Each participant was scheduled for 2 follow-up visits: the removal visit (day 7 after placement) and the healing check visit (day 42 after placement), when they were evaluated for adverse events (AEs), pain, and healing. Four hundred and ninety-six men comprised the analysis population, with 255 in the Standard Sizing arm and 241 in the Modified Sizing arm. Three men experienced a moderate or severe AEs (0.6%), including 2 in the Standard Sizing arm (0.8%) and 1 in the Modified Sizing arm (0.4%). 73.2% of participants were completely healed at the scheduled day 42 healing check visit, with similar percentages across study arms. Virtually all (99.6%) men, regardless of study arm, stated that they were very satisfied or satisfied with the appearance of their circumcised penis, and 98.6% stated that they would recommend ShangRing circumcision to family/friends. The moderate/severe AE rate was low and similar in the 2 study arms, suggesting that provision of one-half the number of adult device sizes is sufficient for safe service delivery. Effectiveness, time to healing, and acceptability were similar in the study arms. The simplicity of the ShangRing technique, and its relative speed, could facilitate VMMC program goals. In addition, sufficiency of fewer device sizes would simplify logistics and inventory.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Circumcision With Shang Ring vs Conventional CircumcisionUrology, 2015
- Clinical trials using the Shang Ring device for male circumcision in Africa: a review2014
- The long-term efficacy of medical male circumcision against HIV acquisitionAIDS, 2013
- Innovative Device Methods for Adult Medical Male Circumcision for HIV PreventionJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2013
- Association of the ANRS-12126 Male Circumcision Project with HIV Levels among Men in a South African Township: Evaluation of Effectiveness using Cross-sectional SurveysPLOS Medicine, 2013
- Time to Complete Wound Healing in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Men following Medical Male Circumcision in Kisumu, Kenya: A Prospective Cohort StudyPLOS ONE, 2013
- How to Choose Appropriate Ring Size for Shang Ring Male CircumcisionJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2012
- Circumcision with a novel disposable device in Chinese children: A randomized controlled trialInternational Journal of Urology, 2012
- Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scalesJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2005
- Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methodsStatistics in Medicine, 1998